美国男子被爱犬舔舐后遭细菌感染 为活命截去四肢
society/201808/00444843.htm
似乎有人在贬低法制
还是不饲养宠物狗,利用动物犯罪,利用动物延伸个性为好。
这条狗为什么没有在法庭以外予以击毙,它不构成疾病的传染源和疑似传染源吗?
引以为戒,引以为界。
如果网页上还以“爱犬”用词,法制,法治,法律条文是较难落实的。
要知道,美国的自由持枪,动态平衡了很多狗患,PR,China 的狗患要比你严重10倍100倍,和宠物狗拥抱、寻找快感,精神交流的满街都是。
当初我放弃任何个人所有,伺机在因特网上传播“核爆炸为地震救灾服务”,狗就是某一类人群的第一攻击力量,这为他们夺得了10多年的时间。
很多在狗患中失去生命的自然人,他们的冤屈,是否会导致新的病毒产生,或许这才是真正的医学高度。
非常奇怪,没有出现“今后和狗保持距离,防止‘犬咬二氧化碳嗜纤维菌感染’复发’”的医嘱,也没有人通知国家武装力量协助“扑杀”传染源,《今日邮报》同样没有提示“依法主动介入”,《美国中文网》亦没有作出提示,甚至转载一幅诱惑,误导和反义的图片。
It seems there are some people degrading the legal system
Or do not raise pet dogs, using animal crime, using animals to extend their personality, it is good.
Why did not the dog kill outside of the court? Did not it crime of violate human?
Take it as a warning and take it as a dividing.
If the "爱犬" is used on the net page, the rule of law and maney others will difficult to implement.
A lot of natural people who have lost their lives in dog disastes, their grievances, whether it can cause a new virus to produce, maybe this is the real high of medicine.
It's very strange. no appearance the Doctor's adviced of "In the future, keep away any dog to prevent the Capnocytophaga Canimorsus recrudescence; and no one has informed the national armed forces to assist in "扑杀(kill)" the source of infection; <DailyMail> also has not hint of "taking the initiative to intervene in accordance to the law"; <Sinovision Net> also did not give the hints, or even reprint a seduction, misleading and antisense picture.
Tsaokuohua = 曹国华 = 320602520830201