一件民事合同纠纷。为了金钱利益，男的把公司女合伙人给告到法庭，说她侵吞公司财务等；男又获得了法庭禁令，禁止女处置公司财产。

女的不服，上诉。

上诉法院研究案情后，判决女的胜诉，撤销了法庭禁令。

掐成红眼鸡的这男的和这女的，是父女。

败诉的男方只有瞪眼看着女的把货提走卖掉，干没辙。他的代理律师，就是我们‘美国法律界的常胜将军’，徐同志。

标的不过是家庭小生意，两个货柜的零杂，父女反目狗皮倒灶的破事。就这还败诉了。黄指望这样的常胜将军打21亿美元的官司，有多大谱？

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2006

KAILIN HU, JACK JOHNSON,

ALLEN EDELBERG,

Appellants,

v.                                                                                                                         Case No. 5D06-308

HAITIAN HU,

Appellee.

________________________________/

HAITIAN HU,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed December 1, 2006

Non-Final Appeal from the Circuit

Court for Orange County,

Cynthia Z. Mackinnon, Judge.

Stephen G. Murty, Ocala, for Appellants.

Thomas Johnson and Pamela Hubbell Cazares

of Chamblee, Johnson & Haynes, P.A.,

Brandon, and Xiao Bing Xu of the Law Offices

of X. Bing Xu, Orlando, for Appellee.

PALMER, J.

In this non-final appeal, defendants Kailin Hu (Kai), Jack Johnson, and Allen

Edelberg challenge the trial court's non-final order granting plaintiff Haitian Hu's motion

for an ex parte temporary injunction.1 Having determined that the complaint and

supporting affidavits were legally insufficient to support the entry of a temporary

injunction without notice, we strike the temporary injunction order.