注册 登录
美国中文网首页 博客首页 美食专栏

艾艾 //www.sinovision.net/?53909 [收藏] [复制] [分享] [RSS]

x

博客栏目停服公告

因网站改版更新,从9月1日零时起美国中文网将不再保留博客栏目,请各位博主自行做好备份,由此带来的不便我们深感歉意,同时欢迎 广大网友入驻新平台!

美国中文网

2024.8.8

分享到微信朋友圈 ×
打开微信,点击底部的“发现”,
使用“扫一扫”即可将网页分享至朋友圈。

网友就桑兰案致美联社(及转载媒体)公开信定稿及特别致谢

已有 97861 次阅读2011-7-14 20:32 分享到微信

网友就桑兰案致美联社(及转载媒体)公开信定稿已出炉,并已发给美联社。这是一个集体的劳动成果,十分感谢所有筒子们,群策群力,查找资料,提出意见,修改文法,提供媒体联系方式,帮忙收集统计签名等。
艾艾被大家赶鸭子上架做了执笔人,能力有限,英语也是三脚猫,从内容到文本都是大家集体合作的成果。在此特别感谢以下网友:lawandorder先生,毛茂,mingbuping,pollyzixin,GOUP律师,kittyzfong,春夏秋冬,第一缕阳光,xiangrikui,看戏党地下党员,subway,看好戏,以及提出意见及联署的各位筒子们,名单太长(见后),一并感谢大家的热心帮助。
大家在博文和发给我的email里所提出的意见,建议,资料及补充纠正等,艾艾已全部看过并仔细考虑采纳。由于时间原因无法一一回复,在此一并感谢所有筒子们。

定稿已于7月15日发给美联社。感谢188位网友的联署,包括40位实名网友及148位网名网友。(名单统计截止于7月15日美国西部时间晚八时)

博士起草的帖子非常好非常专业,感谢他!前一封信是普通网友的呐喊,而岳博士那篇是专业人士的深刻剖析。这篇是打狗棒,岳博士那篇是夺命剑,呵呵。如果大家决定发岳博士的作为第二封公开信的话,我第一个签名!

注:由于本稿是大家共同努力和讨论的结果,我只是执笔人。而且大家也都签名同意发表。我没有权力为所有人作出撤换稿子的决定。如果您在本稿签名过,但现在认为本稿不妥,不愿署名的,请跟帖告知,或email联系我。

==========================================================================

Dear Sir or Madam,

We are readers of your news article “Lawyer: Deal reached to care for paralyzed gymnast” dated July 12, 2011, written by Mr. Larry Neumeister, Associated Press. Most of us are are from north-america and mainland China, and have been reading the news about Sang Lan’s lawsuit for the past two months.

We write to request your attention to the inaccurate and misleading statements made by the lawyer for the paralyzed gymnast. We also request that you consider publishing a remedial report based on the information stated in the letter, as we believe any reputable and responsible news organization should do.

Below is an incomplete list of misleading or inaccurate statements in the report as well as the facts we discovered to challenge those statements.

1.      "The lawyer, Ming Hai, said he could not divulge details of the deal. Still, he said it will provide up to $10 million in cash and health care over the lifetime of the 30-year-old gymnast, Sang Lan." (underlines added)

What we found: the statement of "(TIG) will provide up to $10 million in cash" is misleading, and "(TIG) will provide health care over the lifetime of Sang Lan" is what she already got in 1998.  In other words, what is agreed in the settlement is no different from what had been stipulated in the original insurance policy in 1998.

Under the current insurance policy established in 1998, Sang Lan already has a coverage up to $10 million dollars, which of course is not in cash.  This information is available at http://www.sinovision.net/blog/ksliu/details/85486.html.  Unless there is a a cheque with a substantial dollar amount issued to Sang Lan (which was denied by TIG Insurance Company), Ming Hai’s statement about the "up to $10 million in cash"is evidently incorrect and obviously made to mislead the readers.

We have contacted TIG Insurance Company to verify Ming Hai's statement. The Director of Litigation Richard Fabian denied that TIG paid a fat cheque to Sang Lan. Apparently $10 million is a big dollar amount. Although both parties didn't disclose the amount of the monetary compensation, what Ming Hai said is contrary to TIG’s stated position. (For our investigatory work please refer to https://www.sinovision.net/blog/aiai/details/85691.html)

Also, Mr Fabian stated that TIG denied all the allegations that Sang Lan made in her complaint, since they didn't do anything wrong, nor did TIG make any apology to Sang LanTIG has been paying for Sang Lan's medical expense claims in the past 13 years, fully in compliance with the insurance policy. Mr Fabian also stated that Sang Lan's insurance policy has not been revised during the settlement.

Furthermore, some documents from TIG dated 1998 (please refer to http://www.sinovision.net/blog/ksliu/details/85486.html) already explained that what she got is a life-long insurance, and the injury-related medical expenses are eligible for claim. This is in agreement to TIG’s original agreement or insurance policy.  

2. "The settlement will provide money to cover Lan's health care in China.  Previously, her health care was paid for only in the United States." (underlines added)

What we found: Sang Lan's health care has been paid by three parties: TIG, the national health insurance in China and her employer in China, while most of the Chinese people only have coverage from the national health insurance.

First, as Mr Fabian stated, TIG has been paying her for her health care in compliance with her insurance policy. And that includes her eligible medical expenses in China.  Please refer to the explanation to the insurance policy (http://www.sinovision.net/blog/ksliu/details/85486.html)  

Second, Sang Lan herself have stated a few times (both in the past and recently), that she has medical expense coverage by the national health insurance in China according to the health plan's policy.

Third, again, Sang Lan stated before that her rehabilitation expenses (which is not an eligible expense for the above-mentioned health insurance in China) have been paid by her employer in China.

For Sang Lan's own statements about her medical expense coverage in China, please refer to her own blog: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_47420b930100cj4p.html

3. "He said she was staying ... for another month before returning to Beijing, where she will live with her boyfriend and continue to earn about $230 a month at speaking engagements and other public functions." (underlines added)

What we found: the above statement about her income in China is incorrect, and is contrary to what Sang Lan and her boyfriend have been saying in the past. Sang Lan has been living a very good life in China.  She is much wealthier than most of the Chinese people, and her monthly income is around $4,500 (in USD), which is much more than the $230 Ming Hai claimed.

According to their statements before (one example would be an interview conducted by a Chinese media; please refer to http://sports.cn.yahoo.com/10-08-/324/2bpa1.html ), following is a list of facts about Sang Lan's financial situation:
- She owns two real estate properties in China, both fully paid. And one of them is in Beijing, one of the cities with the highest real estate price in the world.

- In 1998, She was paid $50,000 (in USD) by TIG Insurance Company.  Other than that, she got another $50,000 (in USD) from General Administration of Sports of China.

- She has a good job, and her current monthly employment income is about $4,500 (in USD), which translates to an annual salary of $54,000 (in USD).  Please note that the average income for  people living in Beijing is about $2,700.

- There was a trust fund set up in 1998, with Sang Lan being the beneficiary. The fund raised $170,000 USD through donations in 1998. From 1998 to 2008, this fund had provided Sang Lan a monthly support in the amount of $500 USD, which translates to $6,000 USD a year. And in 2008, the trustees provided all the remaining fund (over $140,000 USD) to Sang Lan.

- She owns a Van.

- She hires a live-in home personal care attendant who gets paid $540 a month (she also accompanied Sang Lan to US this time).

On another note, according to Ming Hai's blog post, Sang Lan rented a single house with a swimming pool for her temporary place in New York, and paid $4,000 for the two-month stay.


4. ""Thirteen years ago she had a tragic fall that almost killed her,"
Hai said. "She got her life back again. The American people gave her a second life. She'll always remember that in her mind. She loves this country. She loves whatever this country has done for her."" (underlines added)

This is the most important part, and this is why we wrote to you. “We are not what we say; we are what we do.”  Ming Hai stated that Sang Lan thinks that the American people gave her a second life and she'll always remember that in her mind. But what did she do to American people?

Here’s what she did to American people (please refer to her complaint, http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_857060240100siii.html):

- She sued US Gymnastic Federation, which gave her help after her fall in 1998. (the Gymnastic Federation was dismissed now)
- She sued the insurance companies, which have been paying for her medical expenses in 1998 and all the years until today. (the insurance companies were dismissed now)
- She sued an Chinese-American family (
Kao Sung Liu, Gina Hiu-Hung Liu and their son Winston Sie).

And here're some facts about the Chinese-American family:
-Who are they?  They are the family that voluntarily took care of Sang
Lan (who they didn't know at all) for 10 months after her accident in 1998. Although Sang Lan received generous donation and had funds to use for her home care expenses, the family decided to bring her into their own home and provided the most meticulous care, all by themselves, all for free, in order to save the funds for her future living. In fact, they themselves were the biggest donor of the above-mentioned trust fund for Sang Lan.

- What did the American family (the Liu family) do? They can probably write a book about all the effort and help they offered to Sang Lan during that 10 months. Long story short, from a third party's perspective, they didn't do anything obviously wrong. And most importantly, Sang Lan had been expressing her gratitude numerous times towards that American family in the past 13 years until she sued them this year.  And in 2008 she even came to US and specifically visited Liu family to thank them.

-What did Sang Lan say about the Liu family?  She has written several articles with deep gratitude to the Liu family.  In one of the articles she wrote, “At that critical point in 1998, aunt Hiu-hung treated me like her own daughter.  Like a mother cares for her child, she helped me in getting through that difficult time.”  (please refer to her own blog: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_47420b93010003f1.html)  

- And what has Sang Lan done for this family who took care of her for 10 months after the accident? A billion dollars law suit!

"Don't bite the hands that feed you." Sang Lan stated that she always remembers the American people who helped her. Based on the above things she did, does she really think so? Or suing the American people who helped her is her special way of remembering them in her mind & thanking them for their help?

All of the facts we stated in this note are solid and backed by evidence. And should you have any questions, or need more information, we are more than happy to assist you.  We understand that due to the language barrier, not all of the relevant information flows smoothly to the US media, and we will do what we can to let people know the true story.

We urge you to seriously consider our request that you publish a remedial report based on the information we have provided in this letter.

We thank you for your attention on this matter. If you have any further question, please feel free to contact us.  We can be reached at aiai.young@gmail.com. We look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

Aiai Young, on behalf of (注:为隐私故,实名签名筒子们的姓名在此略去):

Bloggers (most of which are from https://www.sinovision.net/blog/):

2011死磕迷,   保姆小杜,    佳佳,     folk3,    春夏秋冬,   pollyzixin,   不屈仙人,

 红男绿女,   dodoaush,    weijs,      loveparadise,   苏岛橘子,   GOUP律师,   女猫晒晒,

 抛砖引玉,    胡了,     maomao1,     大梦如戏,    elba,      wangwang,      jake, 

 2012不寻常,     对岸的灯,    毛茂,      小迷糊,    中国大鼻子,   luren, 

lin010,    INOFD,    mgzww999,    dogwood,     xiangrikui,    lovebirds, 

爱娱乐,     mingbuping,      红玉,     夏天的驴,    oosakajp,      支持艾艾, INOFD,

 围观群众,   Athene,      holly花园,      指间沙,      前直180,     打假大哥大,    染尽胭脂,胆小鼠, Kingsbury, Nathan,    kittyzfong,       southbank,   titanwinter ,     jamesjie,    AA70A ,   三难1972,  害人害己又害明,      windbell,      看戏党地下党员,        nbxxp,          打酱油,    obama-2011,

我就是局部地区个别人,     路平,     路平ZH,        春到曼哈顿,        xintianyue,     xinqus,

yuanye 8848,       Salong77,            ForJustice,          昆仑一 ,     pseudososo,      jake, 

豆子猫 ,    布依族,    今宵夜深沉,    缠唐韵轩,     女公子,      看你怎么演到最后,     在家看好戏,

凤毛麟角,   当空彩虹,    初夏雨霏霏,    烂剑两把,    第一健康,    蔑视丧蝗,    包子打狗,    小聪,

看好戏,      桑棍做剑,    定哥,       相信好人,      何必当初,      一帆风顺,   静清雨滴声,    chi202,    Northstar,     CNM_HM,     Zoebb88,    xml11,     CINDY197233,    chachacha,

南海渔人,    230美元,      tobuto,       第一缕阳光,      磕米粉,      oyoyoxy,        angelwing,

supergirl2011,      开开心心看戏,      yyu8561,        14417335,        薰衣草,      齐人忧天,

磕小粉,      一米阳光2011,    太阳风暴11,       Lotus ,       hicb2011,       海棠馆主,          

扭腰过客,       jennleng ,         懒猴子,       xinkaixin,      chuanbo2010,      清茶,       

 bayonet123456,    网络漫步,       titawu,        cherrylcxc317,       妞妞001122,     wzgwz2012,蝴蝶 zoebb88,sunying,    west-east,    marygeng,   茭白好好吃,    小馋猫, 橡皮擦,梦醉唐朝,   心愿风铃1987,    lilaoTAO,     螨婷我信赖,   V2倒蛋,   要船票, 工藤美雪77,花儿那么红

 


免责声明:本文中使用的图片均由博主自行发布,与本网无关,如有侵权,请联系博主进行删除。







鲜花

握手

雷人

路过

鸡蛋

发表评论 评论 (296 个评论)

回复 dogwood 2011-7-15 23:14
To: pollyzixin 你曾经说:
这样不妥,签名是应为那篇文章,大家都知道这篇是岳写的,如果我们分出去一部分签名,第一削弱了我们公开新的力量,第二容易给准备找我们茬的人们以口舌,说我们造假,其实把岳的附在此信的后面,声明作者出自一位不愿透露姓名的民间法律专家,这样很真实也不是力度
这样不妥,岳东晓大概不会同意。因为他明确表示不愿署名。他只是做了一下“秘书”。
回复 mingbuping 2011-7-15 23:13
To: dogwood 你曾经说:
我不认为他是海明。
虽然他的观点我不完全赞同,但是他不骂人,而且说的话有一定道理,人和人的看法不同是正常的。我们应该在求大同的同时,能够存小异。

“而且美国人就明判是非吗?因为他们有胸毛?大多数美国人,你问他们1/2+1/3,他们会告诉你2/5”

他的嘴已经开始不干净了。
回复 海明是阿Q 2011-7-15 23:11
To: dogwood 你曾经说:
尊重你发表意见的权利,咱们求大同,存小异,可以吗?
谢谢理解,我就是个穷教书的,希望别人不要以为中国人都象桑海那么无耻。普通民众都是以偏概全的。
回复 dogwood 2011-7-15 23:11
To: 爱娱乐 你曾经说:
艾艾,我觉得最重要的是赶紧发出去,过了两天,人们对于这个事情的记忆也正在消退,趁热打铁很重要。
岳博士的文章可以同时发出去,不要注明是中英文板,把签名分配一下,一边一部分,就算有重叠都可以。这就是一个网络名义,不是法律文件。不需要过于严谨的。

时间才是最最重要的!

同意,可以把少数支持岳文的人跳出来,比如我,放到岳文下面。
另外,如果艾艾也觉得岳文比较好,请先发岳文,反之,先发此文。

另外,恳请大家可以容得不同的意见,不同的声音。
回复 pollyzixin 2011-7-15 23:10
To: kittyzfong 你曾经说:
赞同!时间很重要,要赶在胖大海新戏开场前发出去!
这样不妥,签名是应为那篇文章,大家都知道这篇是岳写的,如果我们分出去一部分签名,第一削弱了我们公开新的力量,第二容易给准备找我们茬的人们以口舌,说我们造假,其实把岳的附在此信的后面,声明作者出自一位不愿透露姓名的民间法律专家,这样很真实也不是力度
回复 mingbuping 2011-7-15 23:10
To: 海明是阿Q 你曾经说:
你提到Casey Anthony的案子,其实这是个很好的例子说明这封信你最期待的结果也只会是适得其反。Casey Anthony人人痛恨,但是逃脱了法律惩罚,所以有书出版,有付费电视访谈,为什么,因为她的恶名和民众对所谓真相的渴求,虽然所有人都已经知道真相,也知道她不可能说出真相。

此外,以正视听,我也一直关心着桑海案,见 https://www.sinovision.net/blog/index.php?act=details&id=85741&reid=168072&bcode=lawyerh

Casey Anthony的案子的致命点是没有确凿的证据,这正是桑兰的致命点。
Casey Anthony虽然逃脱了法律惩罚,但他没逃脱人民的惩罚。你要真懂,看看他以后的日子好过吗。
回复 dogwood 2011-7-15 23:06
To: 海明是阿Q 你曾经说:
再说一遍,我们为什么非要洋人作最终的裁判呢?难道你最大的满足就是他们说一句”桑兰错了,海明欺诈了“?

而且美国人就明判是非吗?因为他们有胸毛?大多数美国人,你问他们1/2+1/3,他们会告诉你2/5.

尊重你发表意见的权利,咱们求大同,存小异,可以吗?
回复 dogwood 2011-7-15 23:05
To: 爱娱乐 你曾经说:
今天闯尽量的那什么“海明是阿Q的”,估计是海明的马甲。还像还有一个什么也是来纠缠的,记得把他们的明早剔掉,免得人家说我们的签名虚假。
我不认为他是海明。
虽然他的观点我不完全赞同,但是他不骂人,而且说的话有一定道理,人和人的看法不同是正常的。我们应该在求大同的同时,能够存小异。
回复 春到曼哈顿 2011-7-15 23:03
To: 海明是阿Q 你曾经说:
再说一遍,我们为什么非要洋人作最终的裁判呢?难道你最大的满足就是他们说一句”桑兰错了,海明欺诈了“?

而且美国人就明判是非吗?因为他们有胸毛?大多数美国人,你问他们1/2+1/3,他们会告诉你2/5.

你可以有你的意见,但请你在这里闭嘴!
回复 海明是阿Q 2011-7-15 22:59
To: dogwood 你曾经说:
但是至少他们不会只听海明单方面的说词。
再说一遍,我们为什么非要洋人作最终的裁判呢?难道你最大的满足就是他们说一句”桑兰错了,海明欺诈了“?

而且美国人就明判是非吗?因为他们有胸毛?大多数美国人,你问他们1/2+1/3,他们会告诉你2/5.
回复 mingbuping 2011-7-15 22:58
To: 海明是阿Q 你曾经说:
给这位也指出一个逻辑错误,你既然认为没有持续追踪的网民看不懂,那你怎么又寄希望于从不关心的美国民众呢?你不怕他们被误导吗?
放心,误导不了美国人民。
只要美国人知道桑兰为了“money” 状告“一个能够照顾她(瘫痪人)十个月的人”,骂的比中国网民更响。
你太小看美国人民了。
回复 kittyzfong 2011-7-15 22:57
To: 爱娱乐 你曾经说:
艾艾,我觉得最重要的是赶紧发出去,过了两天,人们对于这个事情的记忆也正在消退,趁热打铁很重要。
岳博士的文章可以同时发出去,不要注明是中英文板,把签名分配一下,一边一部分,就算有重叠都可以。这就是一个网络名义,不是法律文件。不需要过于严谨的。

时间才是最最重要的!

赞同!时间很重要,要赶在胖大海新戏开场前发出去!
回复 dogwood 2011-7-15 22:52
To: 海明是阿Q 你曾经说:
你认为这一封信出去,美国所谓”主流媒体“就接纳它为事实真相吗?如果它们要进一步了解,你认为海明会害怕美国电视台来采访事实真相吗?

家门不幸,出此孽种,我们只能关起门来打狗。

但是至少他们不会只听海明单方面的说词。
回复 春到曼哈顿 2011-7-15 22:51
To: 海明是阿Q 你曾经说:
你提到Casey Anthony的案子,其实这是个很好的例子说明这封信你最期待的结果也只会是适得其反。Casey Anthony人人痛恨,但是逃脱了法律惩罚,所以有书出版,有付费电视访谈,为什么,因为她的恶名和民众对所谓真相的渴求,虽然所有人都已经知道真相,也知道她不可能说出真相。

此外,以正视听,我也一直关心着桑海案,见 https://www.sinovision.net/blog/index.php?act=details&id=85741&reid=168072&bcode=lawyerh

没有要你签名,你无权在这里指手划脚,请你保持沉默!!!
回复 春到曼哈顿 2011-7-15 22:48
To: mingbuping 你曾经说:
“原告认可被告同意1998年桑兰受伤不是她自己的错(Plaintiff appreciates that defendants agree that the injury sustained by Sang Lan in 1998 is not her own fault.)。”。

看看桑兰是怎么丢脸的:
为了洋人承认not her own fault 都用上了“appreciates”。这句话用这里是“感激”等意思。
“桑兰感激被告同意1998年桑兰受伤不是她自己的错”
为什么要感激,撑死了也就一个‘thanks’

同意北美泽国mingbuping 意见。岳有致命错误,以后再说!
回复 kittyzfong 2011-7-15 22:48
To: 爱娱乐 你曾经说:
今天闯尽量的那什么“海明是阿Q的”,估计是海明的马甲。还像还有一个什么也是来纠缠的,记得把他们的明早剔掉,免得人家说我们的签名虚假。
谢谢提醒!
回复 海明是阿Q 2011-7-15 22:47
To: 海明是阿Q 你曾经说:
逐条驳斥。
1。美国人不是一个具体的人,有一个知道和路人皆知是完全不同的事。而且等莫虎赢了再知道岂不更好。
2。美国人到中国媒体去投诉了吗?
3。你到底要维什么权?难道海明放个屁,你也要维权吗?
4。如果有利,莫虎为什么不给美联社写信陈述事实?

你提到Casey Anthony的案子,其实这是个很好的例子说明这封信你最期待的结果也只会是适得其反。Casey Anthony人人痛恨,但是逃脱了法律惩罚,所以有书出版,有付费电视访谈,为什么,因为她的恶名和民众对所谓真相的渴求,虽然所有人都已经知道真相,也知道她不可能说出真相。

此外,以正视听,我也一直关心着桑海案,见 https://www.sinovision.net/blog/index.php?act=details&id=85741&reid=168072&bcode=lawyerhaiming&totalNum=182&pageNum=17

和我在这个帖子上发布时间:07-14 22:36的留言
回复 爱娱乐 2011-7-15 22:46
To: kittyzfong 你曾经说:
怎么贴到您的上面格式有些不同了,看上去有些零乱,我再E-mail给你一份名单吧!
今天闯尽量的那什么“海明是阿Q的”,估计是海明的马甲。还像还有一个什么也是来纠缠的,记得把他们的明早剔掉,免得人家说我们的签名虚假。
回复 春到曼哈顿 2011-7-15 22:43
To: 海明是阿Q 你曾经说:
给这位也指出一个逻辑错误,你既然认为没有持续追踪的网民看不懂,那你怎么又寄希望于从不关心的美国民众呢?你不怕他们被误导吗?
你可以再推敲50年,你写出来的东西,我仍然指出你的毛病!
回复 春到曼哈顿 2011-7-15 22:40
To: mingbuping 你曾经说:
同意,没什么可纠结的。
同意,没什么可纠结的。
否则,就犯了君子造反,100000年不成的错误!!!

facelist

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

 留言请遵守道德与有关法律,请勿发表与本文章无关的内容(包括告状信、上访信、广告等)。
 所有留言均为网友自行发布,仅代表网友个人意见,不代表本网观点。

关于我们| 反馈意见 | 联系我们| 招聘信息| 返回手机版| 美国中文网

©2024  美国中文网 Sinovision,Inc.  All Rights Reserved. TOP

回顶部