注册 登录
美国中文网首页 博客首页 美食专栏

艾艾 //www.sinovision.net/?53909 [收藏] [复制] [分享] [RSS]

x

博客栏目停服公告

因网站改版更新,从9月1日零时起美国中文网将不再保留博客栏目,请各位博主自行做好备份,由此带来的不便我们深感歉意,同时欢迎 广大网友入驻新平台!

美国中文网

2024.8.8

分享到微信朋友圈 ×
打开微信,点击底部的“发现”,
使用“扫一扫”即可将网页分享至朋友圈。

网友就桑兰案致美联社(及转载媒体)公开信定稿及特别致谢

已有 97876 次阅读2011-7-14 20:32 分享到微信

网友就桑兰案致美联社(及转载媒体)公开信定稿已出炉,并已发给美联社。这是一个集体的劳动成果,十分感谢所有筒子们,群策群力,查找资料,提出意见,修改文法,提供媒体联系方式,帮忙收集统计签名等。
艾艾被大家赶鸭子上架做了执笔人,能力有限,英语也是三脚猫,从内容到文本都是大家集体合作的成果。在此特别感谢以下网友:lawandorder先生,毛茂,mingbuping,pollyzixin,GOUP律师,kittyzfong,春夏秋冬,第一缕阳光,xiangrikui,看戏党地下党员,subway,看好戏,以及提出意见及联署的各位筒子们,名单太长(见后),一并感谢大家的热心帮助。
大家在博文和发给我的email里所提出的意见,建议,资料及补充纠正等,艾艾已全部看过并仔细考虑采纳。由于时间原因无法一一回复,在此一并感谢所有筒子们。

定稿已于7月15日发给美联社。感谢188位网友的联署,包括40位实名网友及148位网名网友。(名单统计截止于7月15日美国西部时间晚八时)

博士起草的帖子非常好非常专业,感谢他!前一封信是普通网友的呐喊,而岳博士那篇是专业人士的深刻剖析。这篇是打狗棒,岳博士那篇是夺命剑,呵呵。如果大家决定发岳博士的作为第二封公开信的话,我第一个签名!

注:由于本稿是大家共同努力和讨论的结果,我只是执笔人。而且大家也都签名同意发表。我没有权力为所有人作出撤换稿子的决定。如果您在本稿签名过,但现在认为本稿不妥,不愿署名的,请跟帖告知,或email联系我。

==========================================================================

Dear Sir or Madam,

We are readers of your news article “Lawyer: Deal reached to care for paralyzed gymnast” dated July 12, 2011, written by Mr. Larry Neumeister, Associated Press. Most of us are are from north-america and mainland China, and have been reading the news about Sang Lan’s lawsuit for the past two months.

We write to request your attention to the inaccurate and misleading statements made by the lawyer for the paralyzed gymnast. We also request that you consider publishing a remedial report based on the information stated in the letter, as we believe any reputable and responsible news organization should do.

Below is an incomplete list of misleading or inaccurate statements in the report as well as the facts we discovered to challenge those statements.

1.      "The lawyer, Ming Hai, said he could not divulge details of the deal. Still, he said it will provide up to $10 million in cash and health care over the lifetime of the 30-year-old gymnast, Sang Lan." (underlines added)

What we found: the statement of "(TIG) will provide up to $10 million in cash" is misleading, and "(TIG) will provide health care over the lifetime of Sang Lan" is what she already got in 1998.  In other words, what is agreed in the settlement is no different from what had been stipulated in the original insurance policy in 1998.

Under the current insurance policy established in 1998, Sang Lan already has a coverage up to $10 million dollars, which of course is not in cash.  This information is available at http://www.sinovision.net/blog/ksliu/details/85486.html.  Unless there is a a cheque with a substantial dollar amount issued to Sang Lan (which was denied by TIG Insurance Company), Ming Hai’s statement about the "up to $10 million in cash"is evidently incorrect and obviously made to mislead the readers.

We have contacted TIG Insurance Company to verify Ming Hai's statement. The Director of Litigation Richard Fabian denied that TIG paid a fat cheque to Sang Lan. Apparently $10 million is a big dollar amount. Although both parties didn't disclose the amount of the monetary compensation, what Ming Hai said is contrary to TIG’s stated position. (For our investigatory work please refer to https://www.sinovision.net/blog/aiai/details/85691.html)

Also, Mr Fabian stated that TIG denied all the allegations that Sang Lan made in her complaint, since they didn't do anything wrong, nor did TIG make any apology to Sang LanTIG has been paying for Sang Lan's medical expense claims in the past 13 years, fully in compliance with the insurance policy. Mr Fabian also stated that Sang Lan's insurance policy has not been revised during the settlement.

Furthermore, some documents from TIG dated 1998 (please refer to http://www.sinovision.net/blog/ksliu/details/85486.html) already explained that what she got is a life-long insurance, and the injury-related medical expenses are eligible for claim. This is in agreement to TIG’s original agreement or insurance policy.  

2. "The settlement will provide money to cover Lan's health care in China.  Previously, her health care was paid for only in the United States." (underlines added)

What we found: Sang Lan's health care has been paid by three parties: TIG, the national health insurance in China and her employer in China, while most of the Chinese people only have coverage from the national health insurance.

First, as Mr Fabian stated, TIG has been paying her for her health care in compliance with her insurance policy. And that includes her eligible medical expenses in China.  Please refer to the explanation to the insurance policy (http://www.sinovision.net/blog/ksliu/details/85486.html)  

Second, Sang Lan herself have stated a few times (both in the past and recently), that she has medical expense coverage by the national health insurance in China according to the health plan's policy.

Third, again, Sang Lan stated before that her rehabilitation expenses (which is not an eligible expense for the above-mentioned health insurance in China) have been paid by her employer in China.

For Sang Lan's own statements about her medical expense coverage in China, please refer to her own blog: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_47420b930100cj4p.html

3. "He said she was staying ... for another month before returning to Beijing, where she will live with her boyfriend and continue to earn about $230 a month at speaking engagements and other public functions." (underlines added)

What we found: the above statement about her income in China is incorrect, and is contrary to what Sang Lan and her boyfriend have been saying in the past. Sang Lan has been living a very good life in China.  She is much wealthier than most of the Chinese people, and her monthly income is around $4,500 (in USD), which is much more than the $230 Ming Hai claimed.

According to their statements before (one example would be an interview conducted by a Chinese media; please refer to http://sports.cn.yahoo.com/10-08-/324/2bpa1.html ), following is a list of facts about Sang Lan's financial situation:
- She owns two real estate properties in China, both fully paid. And one of them is in Beijing, one of the cities with the highest real estate price in the world.

- In 1998, She was paid $50,000 (in USD) by TIG Insurance Company.  Other than that, she got another $50,000 (in USD) from General Administration of Sports of China.

- She has a good job, and her current monthly employment income is about $4,500 (in USD), which translates to an annual salary of $54,000 (in USD).  Please note that the average income for  people living in Beijing is about $2,700.

- There was a trust fund set up in 1998, with Sang Lan being the beneficiary. The fund raised $170,000 USD through donations in 1998. From 1998 to 2008, this fund had provided Sang Lan a monthly support in the amount of $500 USD, which translates to $6,000 USD a year. And in 2008, the trustees provided all the remaining fund (over $140,000 USD) to Sang Lan.

- She owns a Van.

- She hires a live-in home personal care attendant who gets paid $540 a month (she also accompanied Sang Lan to US this time).

On another note, according to Ming Hai's blog post, Sang Lan rented a single house with a swimming pool for her temporary place in New York, and paid $4,000 for the two-month stay.


4. ""Thirteen years ago she had a tragic fall that almost killed her,"
Hai said. "She got her life back again. The American people gave her a second life. She'll always remember that in her mind. She loves this country. She loves whatever this country has done for her."" (underlines added)

This is the most important part, and this is why we wrote to you. “We are not what we say; we are what we do.”  Ming Hai stated that Sang Lan thinks that the American people gave her a second life and she'll always remember that in her mind. But what did she do to American people?

Here’s what she did to American people (please refer to her complaint, http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_857060240100siii.html):

- She sued US Gymnastic Federation, which gave her help after her fall in 1998. (the Gymnastic Federation was dismissed now)
- She sued the insurance companies, which have been paying for her medical expenses in 1998 and all the years until today. (the insurance companies were dismissed now)
- She sued an Chinese-American family (
Kao Sung Liu, Gina Hiu-Hung Liu and their son Winston Sie).

And here're some facts about the Chinese-American family:
-Who are they?  They are the family that voluntarily took care of Sang
Lan (who they didn't know at all) for 10 months after her accident in 1998. Although Sang Lan received generous donation and had funds to use for her home care expenses, the family decided to bring her into their own home and provided the most meticulous care, all by themselves, all for free, in order to save the funds for her future living. In fact, they themselves were the biggest donor of the above-mentioned trust fund for Sang Lan.

- What did the American family (the Liu family) do? They can probably write a book about all the effort and help they offered to Sang Lan during that 10 months. Long story short, from a third party's perspective, they didn't do anything obviously wrong. And most importantly, Sang Lan had been expressing her gratitude numerous times towards that American family in the past 13 years until she sued them this year.  And in 2008 she even came to US and specifically visited Liu family to thank them.

-What did Sang Lan say about the Liu family?  She has written several articles with deep gratitude to the Liu family.  In one of the articles she wrote, “At that critical point in 1998, aunt Hiu-hung treated me like her own daughter.  Like a mother cares for her child, she helped me in getting through that difficult time.”  (please refer to her own blog: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_47420b93010003f1.html)  

- And what has Sang Lan done for this family who took care of her for 10 months after the accident? A billion dollars law suit!

"Don't bite the hands that feed you." Sang Lan stated that she always remembers the American people who helped her. Based on the above things she did, does she really think so? Or suing the American people who helped her is her special way of remembering them in her mind & thanking them for their help?

All of the facts we stated in this note are solid and backed by evidence. And should you have any questions, or need more information, we are more than happy to assist you.  We understand that due to the language barrier, not all of the relevant information flows smoothly to the US media, and we will do what we can to let people know the true story.

We urge you to seriously consider our request that you publish a remedial report based on the information we have provided in this letter.

We thank you for your attention on this matter. If you have any further question, please feel free to contact us.  We can be reached at aiai.young@gmail.com. We look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

Aiai Young, on behalf of (注:为隐私故,实名签名筒子们的姓名在此略去):

Bloggers (most of which are from https://www.sinovision.net/blog/):

2011死磕迷,   保姆小杜,    佳佳,     folk3,    春夏秋冬,   pollyzixin,   不屈仙人,

 红男绿女,   dodoaush,    weijs,      loveparadise,   苏岛橘子,   GOUP律师,   女猫晒晒,

 抛砖引玉,    胡了,     maomao1,     大梦如戏,    elba,      wangwang,      jake, 

 2012不寻常,     对岸的灯,    毛茂,      小迷糊,    中国大鼻子,   luren, 

lin010,    INOFD,    mgzww999,    dogwood,     xiangrikui,    lovebirds, 

爱娱乐,     mingbuping,      红玉,     夏天的驴,    oosakajp,      支持艾艾, INOFD,

 围观群众,   Athene,      holly花园,      指间沙,      前直180,     打假大哥大,    染尽胭脂,胆小鼠, Kingsbury, Nathan,    kittyzfong,       southbank,   titanwinter ,     jamesjie,    AA70A ,   三难1972,  害人害己又害明,      windbell,      看戏党地下党员,        nbxxp,          打酱油,    obama-2011,

我就是局部地区个别人,     路平,     路平ZH,        春到曼哈顿,        xintianyue,     xinqus,

yuanye 8848,       Salong77,            ForJustice,          昆仑一 ,     pseudososo,      jake, 

豆子猫 ,    布依族,    今宵夜深沉,    缠唐韵轩,     女公子,      看你怎么演到最后,     在家看好戏,

凤毛麟角,   当空彩虹,    初夏雨霏霏,    烂剑两把,    第一健康,    蔑视丧蝗,    包子打狗,    小聪,

看好戏,      桑棍做剑,    定哥,       相信好人,      何必当初,      一帆风顺,   静清雨滴声,    chi202,    Northstar,     CNM_HM,     Zoebb88,    xml11,     CINDY197233,    chachacha,

南海渔人,    230美元,      tobuto,       第一缕阳光,      磕米粉,      oyoyoxy,        angelwing,

supergirl2011,      开开心心看戏,      yyu8561,        14417335,        薰衣草,      齐人忧天,

磕小粉,      一米阳光2011,    太阳风暴11,       Lotus ,       hicb2011,       海棠馆主,          

扭腰过客,       jennleng ,         懒猴子,       xinkaixin,      chuanbo2010,      清茶,       

 bayonet123456,    网络漫步,       titawu,        cherrylcxc317,       妞妞001122,     wzgwz2012,蝴蝶 zoebb88,sunying,    west-east,    marygeng,   茭白好好吃,    小馋猫, 橡皮擦,梦醉唐朝,   心愿风铃1987,    lilaoTAO,     螨婷我信赖,   V2倒蛋,   要船票, 工藤美雪77,花儿那么红

 


免责声明:本文中使用的图片均由博主自行发布,与本网无关,如有侵权,请联系博主进行删除。







鲜花

握手

雷人

路过

鸡蛋

发表评论 评论 (296 个评论)

回复 chachacha 2011-7-14 22:34
还有一个提议:HM和Sl 不是得意地说HM的BLOG点击数高吗?从现在开始,我们只请艾艾或其他一位有博客的网友,随时CHECK HM 的博,然后截图到自己的博里,我们全都到这位网友的博里去浏览,根本就不给HM SL 博点击的机会。这位网友的博客点击数在排行榜上的增高,更能增加揭露桑海黄的力度。可行否?
回复 chachacha 2011-7-14 22:26
请问在何处签名?
回复 chachacha 2011-7-14 22:25
另外,要加上,HM said that TIG apologized to Sang Lan, but based on reply from TIG, the insurance company didn‘t apologized to her for anything since TIG never defaults on the insurance policy. 希望英文好的网友帮忙看看这段是否可行。
回复 lovebirds 2011-7-14 22:24
支持艾艾!
回复 dogwood 2011-7-14 22:18
To: dogwood 你曾经说:
俺也不知道,等艾艾发令呢,呵呵。

另外,俺还是建议提一下桑兰有北大学位,我觉得美国人比较讲究自立,一个有北大学位的人再哭穷只能说明自己依赖性太强,提出来比罗列一些无法完全证实的收入更有力。当然,艾艾有自己的全盘考虑,这封信到这个程度已经非常好了,加不加我的支持。

Also, not totally unrelated, that Sang Lan has got a bachelor’s degree from Peking University, Department of Journalism and Communication in 2007.
刚才有个别字,加不加我都支持。
回复 mgzww999 2011-7-14 22:14
现在可以着手把这篇文章译成中文,然后加一个说明发给国内中文媒体。艾艾劳苦功高,特别是你得到的TIG的答复,国内主要媒体已经逐渐看请桑兰的嘴脸,开始较公正的报道。
回复 windbell 2011-7-14 22:09
签名算我一个~
是丢到艾艾信箱里就行了吗?
至于联名,个人认为直接丢媒体就行了,省得给热心的朋友找不必要的麻烦~
虽然我个人还在等船票呢哇哈哈~
回复 胡了 2011-7-14 22:06
To: dogwood 你曾经说:
一篇有多人签名的应该比多篇一人签名的信效果好,何况内容还是重复的。
1,同意大家意见.2,同意署名,3,行动加快.谢谢大家.
回复 春夏秋冬 2011-7-14 22:05
哪位可以把几个帖子里面的网友签名开个贴更新呢?帮艾艾收集一下。。全让艾艾一个人做,我怕把艾艾累死。。。
我博客不停的更新截图,不方便做更新签名贴。。。

哪位帮忙做一个并保持更新??
回复 dogwood 2011-7-14 22:05
To: 磕米粉 你曾经说:
我也签名。 怎么签?
俺也不知道,等艾艾发令呢,呵呵。

另外,俺还是建议提一下桑兰有北大学位,我觉得美国人比较讲究自立,一个有北大学位的人再哭穷只能说明自己依赖性太强,提出来比罗列一些无法完全证实的收入更有力。当然,艾艾有自己的全盘考虑,这封信到这个程度已经非常好了,加不加我的支持。
回复 mgzww999 2011-7-14 22:04
To: mgzww999 你曾经说:
“To save the donation Sang Lan got for her future days”是否可改成“To save the charity fund raised for Sang Lan“
“Thank you for your time. We look forward to your response“建议改成“Thank you for your time and for your interest on this issue“这样显得更客气一些。其它的地方,只要是与AP有关的都应更软化一些。
回复 佳佳 2011-7-14 22:03
To: 红男绿女 你曾经说:
由于艾艾和众网友的努力,致使桑兰海明控制舆论失败,他们现在变得更加疯狂,妄图在刑事起诉上做最后一蹦。建议以艾艾博客为基地讨论如何从舆论上揭露真相,再次挫败桑黄海一伙的邪恶企图。由于刘谢是被告,在他们那里讨论也许会落人口实。

联名别忘了我!

同意。但是,我想这里有认识刘谢的网友,甚至和他们亲近的。希望能转告刘谢,我们在这里争取社会公义和道德底线,也是支持他们。希望他们以某种形式表个态。如果他们目的是一切以撤诉为终点,我们就不要费这劲了。
回复 春夏秋冬 2011-7-14 22:01
To: West-East 你曾经说:
海明/桑兰”谎言大全“, 大家供献;

谁的博客做这个?
艾艾?孙鹰?多空?死磕?
???

俺提供截图。。。那个联合国律师团的截图。。。
回复 佳佳 2011-7-14 21:58
艾艾博主辛苦!另外,如果您有机会和TIG说上话,问一下他们,桑兰和海明多次在公开场合说TIG向他们道歉了(这个译成英文为Apologize)。公众想知道TIG做错了什么,为什么道歉。TIG会在意他们声誉的。谢谢。
回复 mgzww999 2011-7-14 21:58
“To save the donation Sang Lan got for her future days”是否可改成“To save the charity fund raised for Sang Lan“
回复 磕小粉 2011-7-14 21:56
如何签名?
回复 West-East 2011-7-14 21:56
To: 对岸的灯 你曾经说:
同意,别忘了还有黄健,然后发到国内各大网站
海明/桑兰”谎言大全“, 大家供献;

谁的博客做这个?
艾艾?孙鹰?多空?死磕?
???
回复 红男绿女 2011-7-14 21:54
To: subway 你曾经说:
红男绿女这个帖子也得删,因为她引用我的帖子了,哈哈
你得谢谢我的引用,扩大了你的知名度呢!^_^
回复 mgzww999 2011-7-14 21:54
To: 艾艾 你曾经说:
这样是不是有点轰炸的意思?我问问毛茂的意见。她是业内人士,比较专业。
非常好,辛苦了。一点小建议:
“(TIG) will provide up to $10 million in cash“ is not true说的不够确切,应该说“‘it will provide up to $10 million in cash and health care ’ismisleading“,因为后面已经指出,如果现金数额只是小量的就不能这么说。
“And how much is Sang Lan asking for? ONE BILLION dollars”是否可以改成“And what has Sang Lan done for this family who helped her for a second life? A multi billion dollars law suit!“,我觉得这句前后段落的顺序重新安排一下可能更好:
-Who are they? They are the family that voluntarily took care of Sang Lan (who they didn‘t know at all) for 10 months after her fell in 1998. To save the donation Sang Lan got for her future days, they didn‘t even hire anybody. Instead, they did everything for free for 10 months. Furthermore, they are the major donor of the above mentioned trust fund for Sang Lan. What the American family did can probably write a book about all the effort and help they offered to Sang Lan during that 10 months. Long story short, from a third party‘s perspective, they didn‘t do anything obviously wrong. And most importantly, Sang Lan had been expressing her gratitude numerous times towards that American family in the past 13 years until she sued them. And in 2008 she even came to US and specifically visited Liu family to thank them. But, what is Sang Lan doing for this family who helped her for a second life? A multi billion dollars law suit!“.

我认为只发一篇就可以了,大家都发没意思,很可能适得其反。
回复 对岸的灯 2011-7-14 21:53
签名名单最后可否公布一下,看看有没有遗漏?

facelist

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

 留言请遵守道德与有关法律,请勿发表与本文章无关的内容(包括告状信、上访信、广告等)。
 所有留言均为网友自行发布,仅代表网友个人意见,不代表本网观点。

关于我们| 反馈意见 | 联系我们| 招聘信息| 返回手机版| 美国中文网

©2024  美国中文网 Sinovision,Inc.  All Rights Reserved. TOP

回顶部