注册 登录
美国中文网首页 博客首页 美食专栏

艾艾 //www.sinovision.net/?53909 [收藏] [复制] [分享] [RSS]

x

博客栏目停服公告

因网站改版更新,从9月1日零时起美国中文网将不再保留博客栏目,请各位博主自行做好备份,由此带来的不便我们深感歉意,同时欢迎 广大网友入驻新平台!

美国中文网

2024.8.8

分享到微信朋友圈 ×
打开微信,点击底部的“发现”,
使用“扫一扫”即可将网页分享至朋友圈。

网友就桑兰案致美联社(及转载媒体)公开信草稿[第二版]

已有 17104 次阅读2011-7-13 18:18 分享到微信

感谢大家群策群力,草稿已出炉,欢迎大家讨论,补充和提出修改意见。暂定今明两日收集意见,后天定稿发出。并寻求以下帮助:

1. 收集美联社及转载媒体的联系方式。

2. 要不要大家联名?先投下票要不要联名吧。联名的话,愿意署真名的筒子们可将真名发到我信箱:aiai.young@gmail.com;愿意署网名的筒子们可跟帖联署。

3. 征英文好的人才,中文好的人才,proofreading 人才,及翻译人才。

Dear Sir or Madam,

We are a group of individuals who read the news report titled “Lawyer: Deal reached to care for paralyzed gymnast” By Larry Neumeister, Associated Press.  After reading that report, we felt that some of the important statements in that report are inaccurate and misleading.  And we would like to share our thoughts and some key facts that the reporter might have missed. And below is an incomplete list of misleading or inaccurate statements in the report as well as the facts we discovered to challenge those statements.

1.      "The lawyer, Ming Hai, said he could not divulge details of the deal. Still, he said it will provide up to $10 million in cash and health care over the lifetime of the 30-year-old gymnast, Sang Lan."

What we found: the statment of "(TIG) will provide up to $10 million in cash" is not true, and "(TIG) will provide health care over the lifetime of Sang Lan" is what she already got in 1998.  In other words, what Sang Lan is eligible for now is exactly the same as the benefit that the original insurance policy granted in 1998.  

Under the current insurance policy established in 1998, Sang Lan already has a coverage up to $10 million dollars, which of course is not in cash.  This information is available at https://www.sinovision.net/blog/ksliu/details/85486.html.  Unless there is a a cheque with a big dollar amount issued to Sang Lan (which was denied by TIG Insurance Company), Ming Hai’s statement about the "up to $10 million in cash"is evidently incorrect and obviously made to mislead the readers.

We have contacted TIG Insurance Company to verify Ming Hai's statement. The Director of Litigation Richard Fabian denied that TIG paid a fat cheque to Sang Lan. Apparently $10 million is a big dollar amount. Although both parties didn't disclose the amount of the monetary compensation, what Ming Hai said is contrary to what TIG stated.

Also, Richard stated that TIG denied all the allegations that Sang Lan made in her complaint, since they didn't do anything wrong; TIG has been paying for Sang Lan's medical expense claims in the past 13 years, fully in compliance with the insurance policy. Richard also stated that Sang Lan's insurance policy has not been revised during the settlement.

Furthermore, some documents from TIG dated 1998 (please refer to https://www.sinovision.net/blog/ksliu/details/85486.html) already explained that what she got is a life-long insurance, and the injury-related medical expenses are eligible for claim. This is in agreement to TIG’s original agreement or insurance policy.  

2. "The settlement will provide money to cover Lan's health care in China.  Previously, her health care was paid for only in the United States."

What we found: Sang Lan's health care has been paid by three parties: TIG, the national health insurance in China and her employer in China, while most of the Chinese people only have coverage from the national health insurance.

First, as Richard stated, TIG has been paying her for her health care in compliance with her insurance policy. And that includes her eligible medical expenses in China.  Please refer to the explanation to the insurance policy (https://www.sinovision.net/blog/ksliu/details/85486.html)  

Second, Sang Lan herself have stated a few times (both in the past and recently), that she has medical expense coverage by the national health insurance in China according to the health plan's policy.

Third, again, Sang Lan stated before that her rehabilitation expenses (which is not an eligible expense for the above-mentioned health insurance in China) have been paid by her employer in China.

For Sang Lan's own statements about her medical expense coverage in China, please refer to her own blog: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_47420b930100cj4p.html

3. "He said she was staying ... for another month before returning to Beijing, where she will live with her boyfriend and continue to earn about $230 a month at speaking engagements and other public functions."

What we found: the above statement about her income in China is incorrect, and is contrary to what Sang Lan and her boyfriend have been saying in the past. Sang Lan has been living a very good life in China.  She is much wealthier than most of the Chinese people, and her monthly income is around $4,500 (in USD), which is much more than the $230 Ming Hai claimed.

According to their statements before (one example would be an interview conducted by a Chinese media; please refer to http://sports.cn.yahoo.com/10-08-/324/2bpa1.html ), following is a list of facts about Sang Lan's financial situation:
- She owns two real estate properties in China, both fully paid. And one of them is in Beijing, one of the cities with the highest real estate price in the world.

- In 1998, She was paid $50,000 (in USD) by the insurance company.  Other than that, she got another $50,000 (in USD) from General Administration of Sports of China.

- Her current monthly employment income is about $4,500 (in USD), which translates to an annual salary of $54,000 (in USD).  Please note that the average monthly income for a white collar in China is about $500.

- There was a trust fund set up in 1998, with Sang Lan being the beneficiary. The fund raised $170,000 USD through donations in 1998. From 1998 to 2008, this fund had provided Sang Lan a monthly support in the amount of $600-$770 USD (depending on the foreign exchange rate), which translates to $7,200-$9,200 USD a year. And in 2008, the trustees provided all the remaining fund (over $140,000 USD) to Sang Lan.
 
- She owns a Van.

- She hires a live-in home personal care attendant who gets paid $540 a month (she also accompanied Sang Lan to US this time).

On another note, according to Ming Hai's blog post, Sang Lan rented a single house with a swimming pool for her temporary place in New York, and paid $4,000 for the two-month stay.


4. ""Thirteen years ago she had a tragic fall that almost killed her," Hai said. "She got her life back again. The American people gave her a second life. She'll always remember that in her mind. She loves this country. She loves whatever this country has done for her.""

This is the most important part, and this is why we wrote to you. “We are not what we say; we are what we do.”  Ming Hai stated that Sang Lan thinks that the American people gave her a second life and she'll always remember that in her mind. But what did she do?

Here’s what she did (please refer to her complaint, http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_857060240100siii.html):

- She sued US Gymnastic Federation, which gave her help after she fall in 1998. (the Gymnastic Federation was dismissed now)
- She sued the insurance companies, which have been paying for her medical expenses in 1998 and all the years until today. (the insurance companies were dismissed now)
- She sued an American family (Kao Sung Liu, Gina Hiu-Hung Liu and their son Winston Sie).

And here're some facts about the American family:
-Who are they?  They are the family that voluntarily took care of Sang Lan for 10 months after her fell in 1998. To save the donation Sang Lan got for her future days, they didn't even hire anybody. Instead, they did everything for free for 10 months. Furthermore, they are the major donor of the above-mentioned trust fund for Sang Lan.
- And how much is Sang Lan asking for? ONE BILLION dollars.
- What did the American family do? They can probably write a book about it. Long story short, from a third party's perspective, they didn't do anything obviously wrong. And most importantly, Sang Lan had been expressing her gratitude numerous times towards that American family in the past 13 years until she sued them.  And in 2008 she even came to US and specifically visited Liu family to thank them.

"Don't bite the hands that feed you." Sang Lan stated that she always remembers the American people who helped her. Based on the above things she did, does she really think so? Or suing the American people who helped her is her special way of remembering them in her mind & thanking them for their help?

All of the facts we stated in this note are solid and backed by evidence. And should you have any questions, or need more information, we are more than happy to assist you.  We understand that due to the language barrier, not all of the relevant information flows smoothly to the US media, and we will do what we can to let people know the true story.

We do hope that you will be able to disclose the information we provided here, to make your coverage of the case accurate and to make the picture complete.

Thank you for your time.  We look forward to your response. Please feel free to contact us at aiai.young@gmail.com.


免责声明:本文中使用的图片均由博主自行发布,与本网无关,如有侵权,请联系博主进行删除。







鲜花

握手

雷人

路过

鸡蛋

发表评论 评论 (83 个评论)

回复 subway 2011-7-13 23:08
还有桑的薪水问题,住房问题,‘boyfriend“财产问题,最好附上出处在后面,然后注明,如果需要,可以翻译这些出处。
回复 salong77 2011-7-13 23:07
Another thought: should we send a copy of this letter to TIG Insurance Company as well? Especially Sang Lan‘s financial situation? If TIG made the decision based on a false judgement of Sang Lan‘s finacial situation, it will be UNFAIR to other TIG Insuree.
回复 weijs 2011-7-13 23:06
不管需要不需要署名,都强烈支持
回复 subway 2011-7-13 23:04
To: 对岸的灯 你曾经说:
小小声说:我不太懂英文,但是我们这边是叫 maid 的,因为保姆的主要工作是伺候桑兰的生活起居,不知道哪个更合适
想了一下,好像full-time也不是很好,因为保姆就是住她家,24小时全程呢,用live-in ? maid 或者housekeeper都差不多吧,或者就24-hours private housekeeper/maid啦,大家集思广益

还有,那个告几个美国公司,建议也把数额写一下,数额这么大,用海公公的话,美媒体会粉感兴趣的,哈哈。
回复 对岸的灯 2011-7-13 23:03
同意签署本人ID
回复 salong77 2011-7-13 23:02
my two cents:

section 1: “...We were told by the Director of Litigation Richard Fabian denied...: should that be ““...We were told by the Director of Litigation Richard Fabian denying...“?
回复 southbank 2011-7-13 22:48
附议,同意签署本人在猫眼看人的ID:Kingsbury
回复 对岸的灯 2011-7-13 22:46
To: subway 你曾经说:
full-time private housekeeper
小小声说:我不太懂英文,但是我们这边是叫 maid 的,因为保姆的主要工作是伺候桑兰的生活起居,不知道哪个更合适
回复 subway 2011-7-13 22:26
To: subway 你曾经说:
那个stay—home care giver,改成private housekeeper会不会更准确些?
full-time private housekeeper
回复 subway 2011-7-13 22:22
那个stay—home care giver,改成private housekeeper会不会更准确些?
回复 sinouser4 2011-7-13 22:12
还要指出她的agent是fulltime work for her
回复 subway 2011-7-13 21:56
可以加上,她这次带着私人保姆来美国,她pay保姆的工资是RMB 3500 大约$540 美元
回复 打假大哥大 2011-7-13 21:50
more of my 2 cents:

Section 4.
- “And how much is she asking for“. “she“ is ambiguou. Could be: “How much is the plaintiff asking for“
- “What did they do?“. Needs to be clearer. Could be: What did the Liu‘s Family do to help the plaintiff ?“

- “We do hope that you will be able to disclose the info we provided here, to make the picture complete. “ “info“ should be spelled out completely since this is a serious letter. “make your coverage of the case accurate and the picture complete“

my english is not good, but i just wanted to help and share my opinions - humbly.
回复 打假大哥大 2011-7-13 21:41
more of the 2 cents:

Section 3: again, it helps to add web links or specify sources of your information to support all the numbers given here.
回复 打假大哥大 2011-7-13 21:37
more of the 2 cents.

section 2: “The above statement was not correct, and contrary to what Ming Hai and Sang Lan said before about their temporary place in New York. “ -- could be: “the above statement categorically contridicts the infomation he (they) provided to the public in other places.“..... also, better add links to support the arguments.
回复 打假大哥大 2011-7-13 21:31
dear sir/madam: below are my 2 cents. pls remove all after you read them. respectfully.

line 3: add “key“ between “some“ and “facts“
line 4: “reported“ should be “reporter“ ?
ine 3 - 4: could be: “... facts that might have been missing when the report was written...“
line 4: could be “Below is an incomplete list of the statements and facts from the report that we like to challenge.“
....
回复 Athene 2011-7-13 21:25
同意佳佳和dogwood,不了解美国情况,不知道这样的信作用究竟有多大。

但是如果要写,她还做广告!
回复 打假大哥大 2011-7-13 21:21
虽然我是路人,但是绝对支持你!
回复 dogwood 2011-7-13 21:09
To: 佳佳 你曾经说:
艾艾和各位辛苦了。我觉得,每一条,我们都问一下自己,美国媒体,或者说,美国人care吗?他们看了会怎样想?如果是so what的反应那种,就不必说了。同样,投书中文媒体,也是看中国人care吗?这个在美国生活了多年的人应该有个判断。不要让读者觉得我们在一些irrelevant的地方纠缠。
同意,而且不确定的事,千万不要提,不然会功亏一篑。
回复 dogwood 2011-7-13 21:07
艾艾,你这个帖子要沉了,建议再出新版的时候开新贴。

facelist

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

 留言请遵守道德与有关法律,请勿发表与本文章无关的内容(包括告状信、上访信、广告等)。
 所有留言均为网友自行发布,仅代表网友个人意见,不代表本网观点。

关于我们| 反馈意见 | 联系我们| 招聘信息| 返回手机版| 美国中文网

©2024  美国中文网 Sinovision,Inc.  All Rights Reserved. TOP

回顶部