注册 登录
美国中文网首页 博客首页 美食专栏

艾艾 //www.sinovision.net/?53909 [收藏] [复制] [分享] [RSS]

x

博客栏目停服公告

因网站改版更新,从9月1日零时起美国中文网将不再保留博客栏目,请各位博主自行做好备份,由此带来的不便我们深感歉意,同时欢迎 广大网友入驻新平台!

美国中文网

2024.8.8

分享到微信朋友圈 ×
打开微信,点击底部的“发现”,
使用“扫一扫”即可将网页分享至朋友圈。

网友就桑兰案致美联社(及转载媒体)公开信草稿[第二版]

已有 17109 次阅读2011-7-13 18:18 分享到微信

感谢大家群策群力,草稿已出炉,欢迎大家讨论,补充和提出修改意见。暂定今明两日收集意见,后天定稿发出。并寻求以下帮助:

1. 收集美联社及转载媒体的联系方式。

2. 要不要大家联名?先投下票要不要联名吧。联名的话,愿意署真名的筒子们可将真名发到我信箱:aiai.young@gmail.com;愿意署网名的筒子们可跟帖联署。

3. 征英文好的人才,中文好的人才,proofreading 人才,及翻译人才。

Dear Sir or Madam,

We are a group of individuals who read the news report titled “Lawyer: Deal reached to care for paralyzed gymnast” By Larry Neumeister, Associated Press.  After reading that report, we felt that some of the important statements in that report are inaccurate and misleading.  And we would like to share our thoughts and some key facts that the reporter might have missed. And below is an incomplete list of misleading or inaccurate statements in the report as well as the facts we discovered to challenge those statements.

1.      "The lawyer, Ming Hai, said he could not divulge details of the deal. Still, he said it will provide up to $10 million in cash and health care over the lifetime of the 30-year-old gymnast, Sang Lan."

What we found: the statment of "(TIG) will provide up to $10 million in cash" is not true, and "(TIG) will provide health care over the lifetime of Sang Lan" is what she already got in 1998.  In other words, what Sang Lan is eligible for now is exactly the same as the benefit that the original insurance policy granted in 1998.  

Under the current insurance policy established in 1998, Sang Lan already has a coverage up to $10 million dollars, which of course is not in cash.  This information is available at https://www.sinovision.net/blog/ksliu/details/85486.html.  Unless there is a a cheque with a big dollar amount issued to Sang Lan (which was denied by TIG Insurance Company), Ming Hai’s statement about the "up to $10 million in cash"is evidently incorrect and obviously made to mislead the readers.

We have contacted TIG Insurance Company to verify Ming Hai's statement. The Director of Litigation Richard Fabian denied that TIG paid a fat cheque to Sang Lan. Apparently $10 million is a big dollar amount. Although both parties didn't disclose the amount of the monetary compensation, what Ming Hai said is contrary to what TIG stated.

Also, Richard stated that TIG denied all the allegations that Sang Lan made in her complaint, since they didn't do anything wrong; TIG has been paying for Sang Lan's medical expense claims in the past 13 years, fully in compliance with the insurance policy. Richard also stated that Sang Lan's insurance policy has not been revised during the settlement.

Furthermore, some documents from TIG dated 1998 (please refer to https://www.sinovision.net/blog/ksliu/details/85486.html) already explained that what she got is a life-long insurance, and the injury-related medical expenses are eligible for claim. This is in agreement to TIG’s original agreement or insurance policy.  

2. "The settlement will provide money to cover Lan's health care in China.  Previously, her health care was paid for only in the United States."

What we found: Sang Lan's health care has been paid by three parties: TIG, the national health insurance in China and her employer in China, while most of the Chinese people only have coverage from the national health insurance.

First, as Richard stated, TIG has been paying her for her health care in compliance with her insurance policy. And that includes her eligible medical expenses in China.  Please refer to the explanation to the insurance policy (https://www.sinovision.net/blog/ksliu/details/85486.html)  

Second, Sang Lan herself have stated a few times (both in the past and recently), that she has medical expense coverage by the national health insurance in China according to the health plan's policy.

Third, again, Sang Lan stated before that her rehabilitation expenses (which is not an eligible expense for the above-mentioned health insurance in China) have been paid by her employer in China.

For Sang Lan's own statements about her medical expense coverage in China, please refer to her own blog: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_47420b930100cj4p.html

3. "He said she was staying ... for another month before returning to Beijing, where she will live with her boyfriend and continue to earn about $230 a month at speaking engagements and other public functions."

What we found: the above statement about her income in China is incorrect, and is contrary to what Sang Lan and her boyfriend have been saying in the past. Sang Lan has been living a very good life in China.  She is much wealthier than most of the Chinese people, and her monthly income is around $4,500 (in USD), which is much more than the $230 Ming Hai claimed.

According to their statements before (one example would be an interview conducted by a Chinese media; please refer to http://sports.cn.yahoo.com/10-08-/324/2bpa1.html ), following is a list of facts about Sang Lan's financial situation:
- She owns two real estate properties in China, both fully paid. And one of them is in Beijing, one of the cities with the highest real estate price in the world.

- In 1998, She was paid $50,000 (in USD) by the insurance company.  Other than that, she got another $50,000 (in USD) from General Administration of Sports of China.

- Her current monthly employment income is about $4,500 (in USD), which translates to an annual salary of $54,000 (in USD).  Please note that the average monthly income for a white collar in China is about $500.

- There was a trust fund set up in 1998, with Sang Lan being the beneficiary. The fund raised $170,000 USD through donations in 1998. From 1998 to 2008, this fund had provided Sang Lan a monthly support in the amount of $600-$770 USD (depending on the foreign exchange rate), which translates to $7,200-$9,200 USD a year. And in 2008, the trustees provided all the remaining fund (over $140,000 USD) to Sang Lan.
 
- She owns a Van.

- She hires a live-in home personal care attendant who gets paid $540 a month (she also accompanied Sang Lan to US this time).

On another note, according to Ming Hai's blog post, Sang Lan rented a single house with a swimming pool for her temporary place in New York, and paid $4,000 for the two-month stay.


4. ""Thirteen years ago she had a tragic fall that almost killed her," Hai said. "She got her life back again. The American people gave her a second life. She'll always remember that in her mind. She loves this country. She loves whatever this country has done for her.""

This is the most important part, and this is why we wrote to you. “We are not what we say; we are what we do.”  Ming Hai stated that Sang Lan thinks that the American people gave her a second life and she'll always remember that in her mind. But what did she do?

Here’s what she did (please refer to her complaint, http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_857060240100siii.html):

- She sued US Gymnastic Federation, which gave her help after she fall in 1998. (the Gymnastic Federation was dismissed now)
- She sued the insurance companies, which have been paying for her medical expenses in 1998 and all the years until today. (the insurance companies were dismissed now)
- She sued an American family (Kao Sung Liu, Gina Hiu-Hung Liu and their son Winston Sie).

And here're some facts about the American family:
-Who are they?  They are the family that voluntarily took care of Sang Lan for 10 months after her fell in 1998. To save the donation Sang Lan got for her future days, they didn't even hire anybody. Instead, they did everything for free for 10 months. Furthermore, they are the major donor of the above-mentioned trust fund for Sang Lan.
- And how much is Sang Lan asking for? ONE BILLION dollars.
- What did the American family do? They can probably write a book about it. Long story short, from a third party's perspective, they didn't do anything obviously wrong. And most importantly, Sang Lan had been expressing her gratitude numerous times towards that American family in the past 13 years until she sued them.  And in 2008 she even came to US and specifically visited Liu family to thank them.

"Don't bite the hands that feed you." Sang Lan stated that she always remembers the American people who helped her. Based on the above things she did, does she really think so? Or suing the American people who helped her is her special way of remembering them in her mind & thanking them for their help?

All of the facts we stated in this note are solid and backed by evidence. And should you have any questions, or need more information, we are more than happy to assist you.  We understand that due to the language barrier, not all of the relevant information flows smoothly to the US media, and we will do what we can to let people know the true story.

We do hope that you will be able to disclose the information we provided here, to make your coverage of the case accurate and to make the picture complete.

Thank you for your time.  We look forward to your response. Please feel free to contact us at aiai.young@gmail.com.


免责声明:本文中使用的图片均由博主自行发布,与本网无关,如有侵权,请联系博主进行删除。







鲜花

握手

雷人

路过

鸡蛋

发表评论 评论 (83 个评论)

回复 GOUP律师 2011-7-14 05:38
To: GOUP律师 你曾经说:
Also, Richard also mentioned that they denied all the allegations, since they did nothing wrong, and have been paying for Sang Lan‘s medical expense claims in the past 13 years, according to the insurance policy. They also stated that they didn‘t revise her insurance policy.
----------
一些wording 和grammar修正:

Also, Richard also denied all the allegations hinted by

去掉其中一个also
回复 GOUP律师 2011-7-14 05:36
Also, Richard also mentioned that they denied all the allegations, since they did nothing wrong, and have been paying for Sang Lan‘s medical expense claims in the past 13 years, according to the insurance policy. They also stated that they didn‘t revise her insurance policy.
----------
一些wording 和grammar修正:

Also, Richard also denied all the allegations hinted by Haiming at the media conference on 11 July 2011, since they hadn‘t done anything wrong. They had been paying for Sang Lan‘s medical expense claims in the past 13 years, fully according to the insurance policy. They also stated that Sang Lan‘s insurance policy has not been revised during the settlement.
回复 GOUP律师 2011-7-14 04:56
Her boyfriend is supposely her agent 改成:Her boyfriend is allegedly hired by her as the agent.
回复 GOUP律师 2011-7-14 04:51
She has three dogs 改成 She has three pet dogs
(to identify the uses of the dogs, not for her health reasons)
回复 GOUP律师 2011-7-14 04:48
这个caregiver 有待考虑 (She hires a live-in home care-giver ....)
Caregiver (US, Canadian usage) are words normally used to refer to unpaid relatives or friends of a disabled individual who help that individual with his or her activities of daily living.
我认为应该改成:Personal Care Attendant (PCA)
回复 GOUP律师 2011-7-14 04:40
我觉得文章后面的这一句应该加在第一点引用里:
The settlement will provide money to cover Lan‘s health care in China. Previously, her health care was paid for only in the United States.
这样才能说明文章的说法和事实不符。
回复 yuanye8848 2011-7-14 03:53
艾艾注意:

桑兰除宁波有一套住宅外,在北京有两套住宅,其中一套是高档住宅;
她还有一地下车库,出租给以色列大使,每月人民币800元的租金收入。
回复 titanwinter 2011-7-14 03:47
同意签署本人id titanwinter
回复 又伤又烂 2011-7-14 02:50
我参加,怎么签名
回复 支持艾艾 2011-7-14 02:32
署名加我一个~
回复 titanwinter 2011-7-14 01:59
我觉得网友直接签网名好了。美国中文网的网名就好
回复 夏天的驴 2011-7-14 01:56
艾艾辛苦了!致敬!
回复 夏天的驴 2011-7-14 01:51
公开信应该寄入: 中国几大网络 : 腾讯,搜狐, 雅虎,新浪。

论坛:天涯,猫扑 ,豆瓣。

请大家补充
回复 mingbuping 2011-7-14 01:09
To: luren 你曾经说:
写得不错, 辛苦了! 不过律师开记者会是11日不是12日.
thanks
回复 luren 2011-7-14 01:06
To: mingbuping 你曾经说:
我觉得海明利用他们的“保密协议”不断的在媒体上炫耀他们的胜利,蒙骗国内的网民。如果保险公司能够对海明和桑兰进行质疑应该有更大说服力。
我起草了一封信,放在了我sina的网页上。也许可以用来作为草稿:
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_7f1f096f0100uc6v.html

写给桑兰保险公司的一封信


To 美方3家保险公司的负责人:


我是关心桑兰案的住在美

写得不错, 辛苦了! 不过律师开记者会是11日不是12日.
回复 mingbuping 2011-7-14 00:55
我觉得海明利用他们的“保密协议”不断的在媒体上炫耀他们的胜利,蒙骗国内的网民。如果保险公司能够对海明和桑兰进行质疑应该有更大说服力。
我起草了一封信,放在了我sina的网页上。也许可以用来作为草稿:
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_7f1f096f0100uc6v.html

写给桑兰保险公司的一封信


To 美方3家保险公司的负责人:


我是关心桑兰案的住在美国的华人网民。桑兰的律师海明于7/12/2011 召开了记者招待会,在会上海明律师向多家中文媒体出示了与贵公司签署的“保密协议”,并特意展示了协议的最后一页(带有签字的一页)。另据海明自己博客证实,他已将协议的详细的(or 部分)内容透露给中国中央电视台的两位记者(附)。

我们想知道:既然是保密协议,海明有没有权力透露里面的内容。如果贵公司不对他的行为有所质疑,我们是否可以理解他的行为是合法的。网友是否有权要求他公开协议内容(实际他已对个别媒体公开)。我们所以要让他公开协议内容是为了保护贵公司,保护桑兰的被告方,保护广大投保人,以及保护桑兰的利益。

1。保护贵公司的声誉:

海明告诉媒体:会议前,“美国体操协会,还有三家保险公司今天都有派负责人,律师过来” ”,“这个保密协议我们想得到的都得到了”“ 今天正式的在这个文件里,美国体操协会和保险公司表示,调查之后的结果,他们承认桑兰受伤不是她自己的失误,不是她的责任。”“白纸黑字这样写着”“大家都签了字”。

桑兰更进一步表示:“今天是这场维权案的很大的一个胜利”,“白纸黑字他们签下了,承认了不是我的失守导致从马上摔下来的原因,今天在这里,有合同,有法律效率的解答。”

海明还告诉中国媒体:桑兰所以能够让贵公司修改13年的条例,是因为“桑兰个人她有她的魅力,在美国人当中她有她特殊的威信,”“今天为什么我们比较顺利呢,是一个延续,其实保险公司有些他们不需要给我们,比方說钱。我们只要求在中国的医疗,给钱说明他们很喜欢她,很同情她的遭遇,” “如果换上别人呢,人家完全可以通过法律程序,像莫虎那样一个制裁动议给你撤案了,13年了吗,人家为什么不这样做,一见到是桑兰来要求权力,人家就先跟我沟通。。。”

我们很想知道的是,你们“同情她的什么遭遇”“是否因为她是桑兰,你们才修改了合同”?我们只是不希望看到你们被他们欺骗,因为他们刚刚欺骗了美国的媒体,说桑兰在中国每月只靠$230美金生活,他们把与贵公司签订的新合同透露给中美媒体。这很可能会损坏贵公司的利益。

2。保护桑兰案的被告方。

桑兰案桑兰方对现存的三个被告,刘、谢、莫诉讼的主要罪名是没有及时为桑兰起诉有关责任方,例如体操协会,耽误了桑兰的诉讼追溯期。在会上,海明手持和贵方签立的新合同对被告方进行要挟:“桑兰的保险在中国得到使用,有些金钱的好处”,“也是桑兰本来就应该得到的”。“过去13年该有的没拿到,也让我们回忆一下,想一想,我们今天得到的这些,13年前桑兰没得到”。“13年前,在诉讼期内应该更容易得到,为什么没人帮她要。。。”。如果贵方确实承认了“桑兰受伤不是她自己的失误”,而且赔偿了你们本不该给桑兰的补偿(海明:“其实保险公司有些他们不需要给我们”),并为此成为桑兰诉讼被告方的理由,对桑兰的被告方是不公平的。

3。保护广大投保人的利益。

很简单,在贵公司上保险的不只桑兰一人,如果可以因为桑兰的魅力和贵公司个别人的喜欢和同情(他们特别强调你们和他们是朋友,而且有一个人的夫人是中国人,对他们很友好)就网开一面,那就是对广大投保人的不公平,因为你们是在滥用投保人的钱为你们的个人喜好服务。贵公司的信誉值得怀疑。在保险政策上,所有的保人应该有同等的权利。

4。保护桑兰的权利。

桑兰打这场官司,和贵公司索赔几个亿是为了“维权”和“讨回公道”。我们希望你们和她解释清楚了你们的新合同,她不会受骗,为了你们给她的一点小利而放弃她的原则。另外,她很可能为此输在以后对其他的被告上。因为她对你们的撤诉,使她失去了对其他上诉“案件的基础“。她可能为此损失成千上亿的钱。

非常感谢你们能够在百忙中抽出时间看我的信,并希望能对我的疑问进行解答。

附:海明说:“今天下午,中国中央电视台的两位记者,前来我的律师楼对桑兰和我进行了采访。他们可以证实,美方确实白纸黑字的认同1998年友好运动会上桑兰的摔伤不是桑兰自己的失手或失误。在协议上签字的有:桑兰,海明,保险公司,美国体操协会及被告律师等。请华人同胞们不要再骚扰人家,有问题问我。”
回复 folk3 2011-7-13 23:54
三。英文媒体:从对美联社今天的报道的回应着手,因为美国英文媒体一直未介入,今天都转载了美联社的报道。第一段可指出美联社报道中的失误、第二段简介案情、第三段:我们的态度和要求、第四段联络方法及大家的签名。(也可从海明在保险公司秘密合同和美国体操协会的上欺骗舆论舆论入手。)

所谓的记者会上,根本没有美联社的记者在场,撰稿的美联社记者从何人从何处取得和桑兰一伙人一样的说法???
这个才是要美联社回答的要点之一.
回复 春夏秋冬 2011-7-13 23:54
桑兰还有自己的桑兰基金会。。。。
我有个截图的。。我发给你。。。
有桑兰自己写的汇票。。。10万元。。。
回复 INOFD 2011-7-13 23:51
To: subway 你曾经说:
艾艾的信箱还要小心坏人发有毒信件
After reading that report, we felt that some of the important statements in that report [are] inaccurate and misleading.

We were told by the Director of Litigation, Richard Fabian, that TIG [did not pay] a fat cheque to Sang Lan. Apparently $10 million is [a]big dollar amount.

“He(Ming Hai) said she [is] staying in an apartment in Nassau County on New York‘s Long Island.“

In his blog, Ming Hai said that Sang Lan [has rented] a single house with a swimming pool.
回复 subway 2011-7-13 23:10
艾艾的信箱还要小心坏人发有毒信件

facelist

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

 留言请遵守道德与有关法律,请勿发表与本文章无关的内容(包括告状信、上访信、广告等)。
 所有留言均为网友自行发布,仅代表网友个人意见,不代表本网观点。

关于我们| 反馈意见 | 联系我们| 招聘信息| 返回手机版| 美国中文网

©2024  美国中文网 Sinovision,Inc.  All Rights Reserved. TOP

回顶部