女性对不同类型性高潮的体验——对快感素养的呼唤？

——原载《国际性健康杂志》2023年3月1日在线发布——

<International Journal of Sexual Health> Published online: March 1, 2023

【摘要】背景：关于女性的性行为和不同性高潮的存在一直存在争议。辩论倾向于解剖学和生理学的证据，这往往将主观经验排除在外。目前的混合方法研究的目的是捕捉女性对她们性高潮状态经历的描述。方法：作为更大型在线调查的一部分，来自社区样本的513名女性（M = 25.89 岁，SD = 5.60）填写了关于她们对不同类型性高潮体验的开放式问题。 此外，女性用表征阴道和阴蒂高潮的双极形容词来评估语义差异。 n = 257名女性 (50%) 的子样本经历过阴道和阴蒂高潮，并在语义差异上分别对两者进行评分。结果：Wilcoxon符号秩检验显示出显着差异，其中阴蒂高潮被评为更尖锐、更容易和更可控，而阴道高潮被评为更狂野、更深沉、更脉动和延伸。在开放式问题中，女性谈论了各种其他高潮体验，例如阴蒂/阴道混合高潮、全身、颈部、肛门或精神高潮。 有些女性不确定她们的性高潮经历。结论：现在是时候整合解剖学、心理生理学和经验数据，并得出结论，无论是“所有阴蒂”还是“阴蒂和阴道”都不足以公正对待女性高潮的复杂性。理解和定义这些不同类型的性高潮，并允许明显的多样性在研究和社会话语中占有一席之地，是未来研究和快感积极性教育的方向。从而提高快感素养。

【关键词】性高潮；女性; 语义差异；混合方法；快感素养

[Abstract] Background：There is an ongoing controversy about women’s sexuality and the existence of different orgasms. The debate is tilted toward anatomical and physiological evidence, which often leaves subjective experiences out of the picture. The aim of the current mixed-methods study was to capture women’s accounts of their experiences of orgasmic states. Methods: As part of a larger online survey, 513 women (M = 25.89 years, SD = 5.60) from a community sample filled in open-ended questions on their experience of different kinds of orgasms. Additionally, women rated semantic differentials with bipolar adjectives characterizing vaginal and clitoral orgasms. A sub-sample of n = 257 women (50%) had experienced both, vaginal and clitoral orgasms and rated both separately on the semantic differential. Results: Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed significant differences in that clitoral orgasms were, amongst others, rated as sharper, easier, and more controllable, while vaginal orgasms were rated as wilder, deeper, more pulsating, and extending. In open-ended questions, women talked about various other orgasmic experiences, such as mixed clitoral/vaginal orgasms, whole body, cervical, anal, or mental orgasms. Some women were uncertain about their orgasmic experiences. Conclusion: It is time to integrate anatomical, psychophysiological, and experiential data and conclude that either “all clitoral” or “clitoral and vaginal” falls short to do justice to the complexity of women’s orgasms. Understanding and defining these various types of orgasms and allowing for the apparent diversity to have its place in research and in social discourse is a task for future research and pleasure-positive sex education to increase pleasure literacy.

[Key words] Orgasm; women; semantic differential; mixed-methods; pleasure literacy

论文原文：Katharina Weitkamp & Fabienne Seline Verena Wehrli  (2023). Women’s Experiences of Different Types of Orgasms—A Call for Pleasure Literacy? International Journal of Sexual Health, Published online: March 1, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2023.2182861