对辱虐型领导的评价:辱虐者性别的调节作用
Evaluations of abusive supervisors: The moderating role of the abuser's gender
——原载美国《组织行为学杂志》2022年第43卷第3期——
U.S.A.<Journal of Organizational Behavior> 43 (3), 2022
【摘要】本研究考察了领导者性别在影响员工如何评价辱虐性监督中的作用。本文认为,与男性领导者相比,辱虐性监督被认为是女性领导者不太典型的领导行为,因为辱虐行为违反了传统上对女性领导者的刻板印象(例如,公共和关怀)。因此,从性别刻板印象理论(例如,缺乏匹配模型和角色一致性理论)中,我们提出,在进行滥用监督的领导者中,员工会认为女性领导者不如男性领导者有效。然而,我们也建议员工将女性领导的辱虐归因于内部特征的程度要低于男性领导。来自在职成年人的实验研究(研究 1)和实地研究(研究 2)的结果都支持我们的假设。也就是说,结果表明,女性领导者的辱虐性监督被视为不太典型的领导行为,因此与辱虐型男性领导者相比,其有效性评级较低。相反,由于辱虐被视为女性非典型行为,员工不太可能对女性领导者的辱虐行为进行内部归因。将讨论对理论和实践的影响。【关键词】滥用监督;失配模型;归因合理化;性别刻板印象
[Abstract] The present research examines the role of leaders' gender in influencing how employees evaluate abusive supervision. This paper argues that abusive supervision is considered to be a less typical leader behavior for female leaders, compared to male leaders, because abusive behaviors violate the stereotypes traditionally prescribed to female leaders (e.g., communal and caring). As such, drawing from gender stereotype theories (e.g., the lack-of-fit model and role congruity theory), we propose that, among leaders who engage in abusive supervision, employees will rate female leaders as less effective than male leaders. However, we also propose that employees will attribute female leaders' abuse to internal characteristics to a lesser extent than male leaders. Results from both an experimental study (Study 1) and a field study (Study 2) conducted with working adults support our hypotheses. Namely, results suggest that female leaders' abusive supervision is viewed as less typical leadership behavior and, consequently, is associated with lower ratings of effectiveness compared to abusive male leaders. Conversely, because abuse is viewed as female-atypical behavior, employees were less likely to make internal attributions for female leaders' abusive behaviors. Implications for theory and practice will be discussed.
[Key words] Abusive supervision; lack-of-fit model; attributional rationalization; gender stereotypes
本中文解析是针对《对辱虐型领导者的评价:施虐者性别的调节作用》(Evaluations of abusive supervisors: The moderating role of the abuser's gender)的论文解析。该文于2022年3月发表于《组织行为学期刊》(Journal of Organizational Behavior)第43卷第3期。作者是美国西切斯特大学的Joseph K. Kim, 美国天普大学的Crystal M. Harold和Brian C. Holtz。
(中文解析请阅《华人心理健康报》2022年10月17日PDF版)
论文原文:Joseph K. Kim, Crystal M. Harold, Brian C. Holtz (2022). Evaluations of abusive supervisors: The moderating role of the abuser's gender. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43 (3): 465-482.https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2581
(需要英文原文的朋友,请联系微信:millerdeng95)