14年研究癌症攻克 华裔科学家陈哲生和他的实验室

https://video.sinovision.net/?id=44705&lxbf=1、、

有点不服气   

看起来陈教授说的“用免疫细胞杀死癌细胞”，似乎和钱永健教授等说的“调整细胞裂变治愈癌症”有所差异。钱永健是2007年的诺贝尔医学化学奖得主，他的获奖内容包括用荧光染色微观细胞。我理解钱永健教授如果活着，他给出的解释应该是：不杀死癌变细胞，用微观自然科学方法，通过调整细胞裂变，将它们还原成正常的人体组织，解除疾患。

似乎钱永健教授的思路要比陈哲生教授更合理，更便于拓展。这里并不唯一认定诺贝尔奖总是青睐高手，史蒂芬霍金教授不是也没有问鼎诺贝尔奖就逝世了吗，金字塔和恐龙还不能证明他的“人类周期毁灭”吗？

仅仅是，在中国每7分钟就增加1名癌症病人，在美国，在俄罗斯，……，不是忽悠，是要悠着点儿。

There are Some Individual Opinion

It seems that Professor Chen's "killing cancer cells use immune cells" , it looks like  to be different that Professor Qian Yongjian said, "adjusting cell fission to cure cancer". Qian Yongjian he was winner of the 2007 Nobel prize in medical & chemistry, his prize includes the fluorescent staining for microscopic cells.  I understand that Professor Qian Yongjian if he is alive, his explanation should be: do not kill cancerous cells, by means of microcosmic natural science, through adjusting the cell fission, reducing them to normal human tissues, relieve disease.

It seems that Professor Qian Yongjian's thinking is more reasonable and easier to expand than Professor Chen Zhesheng. it is not the only thing that the Nobel prize is always send to the best at here, did Professor Stephen Hocking till he death without winning the Nobel prize，can't Pyramid and dinosaurs prove his "the human cycle destruction"? 

（Tsaokuohua = 曹国华 = 320602520830201）