延期审判是好事吗？

章莹颖案再度延期 嫌犯将于2019年4月接受审判

society/201802/00431185.htm

如果克里斯滕森已经大剂量使用了精神药品，法官只应该给出“取消庭审”的裁决。

根据概念和观点，精神失常肇事者的疾患程度决定处罚减轻的程度。

如果依照相关诊断，确认克里斯滕森有精神疾患，但能够认知事件和辨别人物，仅可以减轻处罚。延期一年审判，不指定医学措施，是增加了服用精神药品一年，显然，这不不是积极的法制建设。

只有在确认克里斯滕森精神完全正常，承担全部法律责任的情况下，延期审判是给当事人拓展了适应时间……，那你怎么解释克里斯滕森在服用氯硝西泮呢？

如果依照日本的法制模式，精神病肇事，是按照法院判决实施强制安定的。这里的延期审判，延长了服用精神药品的时间，无论是减轻还是加重了处罚，都是合法的，法院全权决策。可以认为，日本的法院组成人员包括精神医学、社会医学专家，不乏微袭、微涉科技专家。

精神药品在法律上的毒品定义是，使人形成瘾癖。延期审判是好还是孬？

English

Is it a Good Thing to Stay Judgment？

If Christensen has used a large dose of psychotropic drugs already, the judge should only give the decision to "cancel the trial".

If according to the related diagnosis, confirm Christensen has mental illness, but can recognize the event and distinguish the proson and object, only reduce the punishment. After a year of trial and no medical measures, it is an increase in psychotropic drugs for one year， obviously, it is not a positive legal system. 

Only in the case of confirming that Christensen's spirit is completely normal and bear all the legal responsibilities, the delay of trial is  to extend the time to the parties. in that way, how do you explain Christensen's taking clonazepam?

If according to the modle of Japanese legal system, the cause trouble of mental illness，the coercive stability from court decision, the postponement of trial at here, whether the  punish is mitigate or aggravate, all the full power decision from court, It can be considered,the members of the court of justice in Japan include experts in mental medicine and social medicine, no lack experts of the science and technology of micro-harassment and micro-interference.

The definition of Psychotropic drugs on law: To make the person addictive. The deferred trial is good or bad?

（Tsaokuohua=曹国华=320602520830201）