注册 登录
美国中文网首页 博客首页 美食专栏

艾艾 //www.sinovision.net/?53909 [收藏] [复制] [分享] [RSS]

x

博客栏目停服公告

因网站改版更新,从9月1日零时起美国中文网将不再保留博客栏目,请各位博主自行做好备份,由此带来的不便我们深感歉意,同时欢迎 广大网友入驻新平台!

美国中文网

2024.8.8

分享到微信朋友圈 ×
打开微信,点击底部的“发现”,
使用“扫一扫”即可将网页分享至朋友圈。

网友就桑兰案致美联社(及转载媒体)公开信定稿

已有 8671 次阅读2011-7-16 01:00 分享到微信

博主注:网友也要发出自己的声音,媒体不能只是听到“海明说”,“桑兰说”。就这么简单,一点都不复杂。博主对广大网友的致谢和联署网友名单请见:https://www.sinovision.net/blog/aiai/details/86433.html

Dear Sir or Madam,

We are readers of your news article “Lawyer: Deal reached to care for paralyzed gymnast” dated July 12, 2011, written by Mr. Larry Neumeister, Associated Press. Most of us are are from north-america and mainland China, and have been reading the news about Sang Lan’s lawsuit for the past two months.

We write to request your attention to the inaccurate and misleading statements made by the lawyer for the paralyzed gymnast. We also request that you consider publishing a remedial report based on the information stated in the letter, as we believe any reputable and responsible news organization should do.

Below is an incomplete list of misleading or inaccurate statements in the report as well as the facts we discovered to challenge those statements.

1.      "The lawyer, Ming Hai, said he could not divulge details of the deal. Still, he said it will provide up to $10 million in cash and health care over the lifetime of the 30-year-old gymnast, Sang Lan." (underlines added)

What we found: the statement of "(TIG) will provide up to $10 million in cash" is misleading, and "(TIG) will provide health care over the lifetime of Sang Lan" is what she already got in 1998.  In other words, what is agreed in the settlement is no different from what had been stipulated in the original insurance policy in 1998.

Under the current insurance policy established in 1998, Sang Lan already has a coverage up to $10 million dollars, which of course is not in cash.  This information is available at https://www.sinovision.net/blog/ksliu/details/85486.html.  Unless there is a a cheque with a substantial dollar amount issued to Sang Lan (which was denied by TIG Insurance Company), Ming Hai’s statement about the "up to $10 million in cash"is evidently incorrect and obviously made to mislead the readers.

We have contacted TIG Insurance Company to verify Ming Hai's statement. The Director of Litigation Richard Fabian denied that TIG paid a fat cheque to Sang Lan. Apparently $10 million is a big dollar amount. Although both parties didn't disclose the amount of the monetary compensation, what Ming Hai said is contrary to TIG’s stated position. (For our investigatory work please refer to https://www.sinovision.net/blog/aiai/details/85691.html)

Also, Mr Fabian stated that TIG denied all the allegations that Sang Lan made in her complaint, since they didn't do anything wrong, nor did TIG make any apology to Sang Lan; TIG has been paying for Sang Lan's medical expense claims in the past 13 years, fully in compliance with the insurance policy. Mr Fabian also stated that Sang Lan's insurance policy has not been revised during the settlement.

Furthermore, some documents from TIG dated 1998 (please refer to https://www.sinovision.net/blog/ksliu/details/85486.html) already explained that what she got is a life-long insurance, and the injury-related medical expenses are eligible for claim. This is in agreement to TIG’s original agreement or insurance policy.  

2. "The settlement will provide money to cover Lan's health care in China.  Previously, her health care was paid for only in the United States." (underlines added)

What we found: Sang Lan's health care has been paid by three parties: TIG, the national health insurance in China and her employer in China, while most of the Chinese people only have coverage from the national health insurance.

First, as Mr Fabian stated, TIG has been paying her for her health care in compliance with her insurance policy. And that includes her eligible medical expenses in China.  Please refer to the explanation to the insurance policy (https://www.sinovision.net/blog/ksliu/details/85486.html)  

Second, Sang Lan herself have stated a few times (both in the past and recently), that she has medical expense coverage by the national health insurance in China according to the health plan's policy.

Third, again, Sang Lan stated before that her rehabilitation expenses (which is not an eligible expense for the above-mentioned health insurance in China) have been paid by her employer in China.

For Sang Lan's own statements about her medical expense coverage in China, please refer to her own blog: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_47420b930100cj4p.html

3. "He said she was staying ... for another month before returning to Beijing, where she will live with her boyfriend and continue to earn about $230 a month at speaking engagements and other public functions." (underlines added)

What we found: the above statement about her income in China is incorrect, and is contrary to what Sang Lan and her boyfriend have been saying in the past. Sang Lan has been living a very good life in China.  She is much wealthier than most of the Chinese people, and her monthly income is around $4,500 (in USD), which is much more than the $230 Ming Hai claimed.

According to their statements before (one example would be an interview conducted by a Chinese media; please refer to http://sports.cn.yahoo.com/10-08-/324/2bpa1.html ), following is a list of facts about Sang Lan's financial situation:
- She owns two real estate properties in China, both fully paid. And one of them is in Beijing, one of the cities with the highest real estate price in the world.

- In 1998, She was paid $50,000 (in USD) by TIG Insurance Company.  Other than that, she got another $50,000 (in USD) from General Administration of Sports of China.

- She has a good job, and her current monthly employment income is about $4,500 (in USD), which translates to an annual salary of $54,000 (in USD).  Please note that the average income for  people living in Beijing is about $2,700.

- There was a trust fund set up in 1998, with Sang Lan being the beneficiary. The fund raised $170,000 USD through donations in 1998. From 1998 to 2008, this fund had provided Sang Lan a monthly support in the amount of $500 USD, which translates to $6,000 USD a year. And in 2008, the trustees provided all the remaining fund (over $140,000 USD) to Sang Lan.

- She owns a Van.

- She hires a live-in home personal care attendant who gets paid $540 a month (she also accompanied Sang Lan to US this time).

On another note, according to Ming Hai's blog post, Sang Lan rented a single house with a swimming pool for her temporary place in New York, and paid $4,000 for the two-month stay.


4. ""Thirteen years ago she had a tragic fall that almost killed her," Hai said. "She got her life back again. The American people gave her a second life. She'll always remember that in her mind. She loves this country. She loves whatever this country has done for her."" (underlines added)

This is the most important part, and this is why we wrote to you. “We are not what we say; we are what we do.”  Ming Hai stated that Sang Lan thinks that the American people gave her a second life and she'll always remember that in her mind. But what did she do to American people?

Here’s what she did to American people (please refer to her complaint, http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_857060240100siii.html):

- She sued US Gymnastic Federation, which gave her help after her fall in 1998. (the Gymnastic Federation was dismissed now)
- She sued the insurance companies, which have been paying for her medical expenses in 1998 and all the years until today. (the insurance companies were dismissed now)
- She sued an Chinese-American family (Kao Sung Liu, Gina Hiu-Hung Liu and their son Winston Sie).

And here're some facts about the Chinese-American family:
-Who are they?  They are the family that voluntarily took care of Sang Lan (who they didn't know at all) for 10 months after her accident in 1998. Although Sang Lan received generous donation and had funds to use for her home care expenses, the family decided to bring her into their own home and provided the most meticulous care, all by themselves, all for free, in order to save the funds for her future living. In fact, they themselves were the biggest donor of the above-mentioned trust fund for Sang Lan.

- What did the American family (the Liu family) do? They can probably write a book about all the effort and help they offered to Sang Lan during that 10 months. Long story short, from a third party's perspective, they didn't do anything obviously wrong. And most importantly, Sang Lan had been expressing her gratitude numerous times towards that American family in the past 13 years until she sued them this year.  And in 2008 she even came to US and specifically visited Liu family to thank them.

-What did Sang Lan say about the Liu family?  She has written several articles with deep gratitude to the Liu family.  In one of the articles she wrote, “At that critical point in 1998, aunt Hiu-hung treated me like her own daughter.  Like a mother cares for her child, she helped me in getting through that difficult time.”  (please refer to her own blog: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_47420b93010003f1.html)  

- And what has Sang Lan done for this family who took care of her for 10 months after the accident? A billion dollars law suit!

"Don't bite the hands that feed you." Sang Lan stated that she always remembers the American people who helped her. Based on the above things she did, does she really think so? Or suing the American people who helped her is her special way of remembering them in her mind & thanking them for their help?

All of the facts we stated in this note are solid and backed by evidence. And should you have any questions, or need more information, we are more than happy to assist you.  We understand that due to the language barrier, not all of the relevant information flows smoothly to the US media, and we will do what we can to let people know the true story.

We urge you to seriously consider our request that you publish a remedial report based on the information we have provided in this letter.

We thank you for your attention on this matter. If you have any further question, please feel free to contact us.  We can be reached at aiai.young@gmail.com. We look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

Aiai Young, on behalf of (注:为隐私故,实名签名筒子们的姓名在此略去):

Bloggers (most of which are from https://www.sinovision.net/blog/):

2011死磕迷,   保姆小杜,    佳佳,     folk3,    春夏秋冬,   pollyzixin,   不屈仙人,

 红男绿女,   dodoaush,    weijs,      loveparadise,   苏岛橘子,   GOUP律师,   女猫晒晒,

 抛砖引玉,    胡了,     maomao1,     大梦如戏,    elba,      wangwang,      jake, 

 2012不寻常,     对岸的灯,    毛茂,      小迷糊,    中国大鼻子,   luren, 

lin010,    INOFD,    mgzww999,    dogwood,     xiangrikui,    lovebirds, 

爱娱乐,     mingbuping,      红玉,     夏天的驴,    oosakajp,      支持艾艾, INOFD

 围观群众,   Athene,      holly花园,      指间沙,      前直180,     打假大哥大,    染尽胭脂,胆小鼠, Kingsbury Nathan,    kittyzfong,       southbank,   titanwinter ,     jamesjie,    AA70A ,   三难1972,  害人害己又害明,      windbell,      看戏党地下党员,        nbxxp,          打酱油,    obama-2011,

我就是局部地区个别人,     路平,     路平ZH,        春到曼哈顿,        xintianyue,     xinqus,

yuanye 8848,       Salong77,            ForJustice,          昆仑一 ,     pseudososo,      jake, 

豆子猫 ,    布依族,    今宵夜深沉,    缠唐韵轩,     女公子,      看你怎么演到最后,     在家看好戏,

凤毛麟角,   当空彩虹,    初夏雨霏霏,    烂剑两把,    第一健康,    蔑视丧蝗,    包子打狗,    小聪,

看好戏,      桑棍做剑,    定哥,       相信好人,      何必当初,      一帆风顺,   静清雨滴声,    chi202,    Northstar,     CNM_HM,     Zoebb88,    xml11,     CINDY197233,    chachacha,

南海渔人,    230美元,      tobuto,       第一缕阳光,      磕米粉,      oyoyoxy,        angelwing,

supergirl2011,      开开心心看戏,      yyu8561,        14417335,        薰衣草,      齐人忧天,

磕小粉,      一米阳光2011,    太阳风暴11,       Lotus ,       hicb2011,       海棠馆主,          

扭腰过客,       jennleng ,         懒猴子,       xinkaixin,      chuanbo2010,      清茶,       

 bayonet123456,    网络漫步,       titawu,        cherrylcxc317,       妞妞001122,     wzgwz2012,蝴蝶 zoebb88sunying,    west-east,    marygeng,   茭白好好吃,    小馋猫, 橡皮擦,梦醉唐朝,   心愿风铃1987    lilaoTAO,     螨婷我信赖,   V2倒蛋,   要船票, 工藤美雪77,花儿那么红


免责声明:本文中使用的图片均由博主自行发布,与本网无关,如有侵权,请联系博主进行删除。







鲜花

握手

雷人

路过

鸡蛋

发表评论 评论 (23 个评论)

回复 毛茂 2011-7-17 12:14
To: ForJustice 你曾经说:
致陈卫华和中国媒体记者的公开信 (ZT)
1,陈卫华,美国保险公司这次没有额外赔偿桑兰1000万,也没有道歉。美国方已经发出声明了。你们写的得到1000万赔偿和道歉是假新闻。真是对“记者”“媒体人” 概念的一个讽刺!

2,如果中国的新闻都像你们这样报道。不去求证,听取个人之言,就报道假新闻,那真是太恐怖了!太恐怖了!

3,你们这是挑战世界华人网友的智商。也是挑战我们的道德观!
这个记者的水平太差了!好在这个报纸没多少人看。在纽约华人超市随便扔着,不要钱。这样水准的记者如何去抢夺话语权?把大把中国人民的血汗钱白白的烧掉,真让人痛心!
回复 艾艾 2011-7-16 23:12
To: 爱娱乐 你曾经说:
艾艾,这个信能不能这周一前发出去,害命不是周二要带中英文媒体记者去警察局吗,最好是记者报导最后加一句“不过,根据此前发生的事情,桑黄海爆料基本与实际情况相去甚远,报案情况如何,我们要等检察官的意见。”
能这样的话,我们就小胜利了,至少媒体不会任他摆弄。

是的,这个信计划明天发出去
回复 爱娱乐 2011-7-16 23:10
艾艾,这个信能不能这周一前发出去,害命不是周二要带中英文媒体记者去警察局吗,最好是记者报导最后加一句“不过,根据此前发生的事情,桑黄海爆料基本与实际情况相去甚远,报案情况如何,我们要等检察官的意见。”
能这样的话,我们就小胜利了,至少媒体不会任他摆弄。
回复 ForJustice 2011-7-16 20:54
致陈卫华和中国媒体记者的公开信 (ZT)
1,陈卫华,美国保险公司这次没有额外赔偿桑兰1000万,也没有道歉。美国方已经发出声明了。你们写的得到1000万赔偿和道歉是假新闻。真是对“记者”“媒体人” 概念的一个讽刺!

2,如果中国的新闻都像你们这样报道。不去求证,听取个人之言,就报道假新闻,那真是太恐怖了!太恐怖了!

3,你们这是挑战世界华人网友的智商。也是挑战我们的道德观!
请你们不要欺骗善良的中国网友。

请大家和《中国日报》(China Daily) 联系,抗议陈卫华!
回复 红玉 2011-7-16 20:45
谢谢艾艾的辛苦工作。
很感动大家的正义感和善良的心。
虽然我们不认识刘谢夫妇,但是相信他们也被你们无私的精神所感动!
希望国内的人不要被那几个坏人的谣言所蒙蔽!
回复 wangwang 2011-7-16 16:50
谢谢艾艾!辛苦了!
回复 Nathan 2011-7-16 14:53
谢谢艾艾和大家!

第二封信相对比较像专业信函,没有意见。如果发,我签名。
我觉得两封信各有千秋,这封与自发网友身份更贴近,我们表达的是一种情绪,讲述我们了解的事情。更像民意:)
回复 tobuto 2011-7-16 14:19
给桑兰和黄建的建议:
如果你们曾在此案中受到海明的误导甚至欺骗,你们可以向海明所在辖区的纽约州高等法院上诉受理分部的冤情受理委员会投诉海明。
有关投诉律师的方法见该委员会的网址:
http://www.courts.state.ny.us/courts/ad2/attorneymatters_ComplaintAboutaLawyer.shtml
客户投诉律师,不需要有专门的法律知识,也不需要咨询其他律师,表格非常简单。只要在冤情受理委员会的投诉表中的第一页中,填好姓名地址等基本信息,在第二页里填写清楚律师是如何误导你们的,然后签名寄出即可。冤情受理委员会将依据你们提供的事实,决定是否派员展开正式调查。
投诉表(PDF文件)的链接是:
http://www.courts.state.ny.us/courts/ad2/forms/Grievance%20Committee%20Complaint%20Form.pdf
邮寄地址是:
Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts
Renaissance Plaza
335 Adams Street, Suite 2400
Brooklyn, NY 11201-3745
(718) 923-6300

无论这个委员会是否展开调查,也无论调查结果怎样,都不能直接命令海明补偿你们因为他误导/欺骗客户所带来的损失。然而,如果有一个有利于你们的结果,将对你们寻求其他律师帮助带来极大的好处。
同时,纽约州有一个律师客户保护基金会,该基金会成立于1982年,向因受到律师误导/欺骗而蒙受损失的客户提供经济补偿。 建议你们向纽约州高等法院冤情受理委员会提出投诉的同时,也向律师基金会提出调查请求。一旦冤情受理委员会作出对你们有利的调查结论,在海明无法赔偿你们损失的情况下,律师基金会将调查并对你们的损失直接作出补偿。该基金会的网址是:
http://www.nylawfund.org/faq.html

如果你们写英文有困难,第一两封信可以发到博客上,我想会有很多网友愿意帮助你们。等你们同上述机构建立正式联系后,可以向上述机构寻求免费翻译服务。
回复 tobuto 2011-7-16 13:05
To: 网络漫步 你曾经说:
非常感谢艾艾!希望桑黄海的声音有多大,我们的声音能够有足够的分贝。对于桑兰,美国媒体和人们只知道她17岁的不幸。可能并不清楚在她受伤后,大家对她的帮助,以及后回国后中国政府对她的特别关照,从而不知道她这个诉讼,实际是在利用轮椅掩盖真实,用谎言掩饰贪婪,为一己的绝对私利挑战人类道德的底线。我们应该申明,我们与刘谢素不相识,我们也都曾经同情桑兰,但我们今天对刘谢的支持,是因为我们痛恨谎言,珍惜人与人之间
同感。
谢谢艾艾为维护华人名誉做出的努力!
回复 网络漫步 2011-7-16 12:34
非常感谢艾艾!希望桑黄海的声音有多大,我们的声音能够有足够的分贝。对于桑兰,美国媒体和人们只知道她17岁的不幸。可能并不清楚在她受伤后,大家对她的帮助,以及后回国后中国政府对她的特别关照,从而不知道她这个诉讼,实际是在利用轮椅掩盖真实,用谎言掩饰贪婪,为一己的绝对私利挑战人类道德的底线。我们应该申明,我们与刘谢素不相识,我们也都曾经同情桑兰,但我们今天对刘谢的支持,是因为我们痛恨谎言,珍惜人与人之间的互助和信赖,我们希望善良和爱可以在这个世界长存。。
回复 佳佳 2011-7-16 12:15
向艾艾致敬。
回复 loveparadise 2011-7-16 10:50
博主辛苦了,坚决支持,非常感谢.
回复 3386 2011-7-16 09:53
“法官说不准会给New York State Bar写封信,谴责他们允许CUNY法学院的毕业生参加律师考试,他拿出的证据说不定就是这些一改再改仍然不知所云的一两重的东东啊!”----哈哈哈,严重同意!
支持艾艾和所有网友!
回复 指间沙 2011-7-16 08:22
支持!
谢谢艾艾和所有参与的网友!
回复 关东大响马 2011-7-16 07:24
俺也署名,以求真相。
回复 当空彩虹 2011-7-16 03:16
转贴,我没有博客,所以希望博主把这帖子,用另一贴的形式贴出还,这个新网友的水平也很高。谢谢!
sec592
看了几个月了,终于忍不住注册个ID说几句。

1 保险公司说it is not Sang Lan‘s own fault并不能证明桑兰学艺很精,更谈不上平反。

谈几个可能性吧

可能性一 桑兰的教练没有把某个要领教好,桑兰出了事故。这样桑兰栽下来也可以说不是her fault,但这是典型的学艺不精!

可能性二 桑兰出事故是因为不适应当时纽约的鬼气候或洋妞的尖叫,发挥失常。For argument‘s sake,仍然可以强说it is not her own fault。但是,因外界环境发挥失常还是学艺不精的表现。

可能性三 桑兰的领队事前和她谈了友好运动会后她必须退役的安排,影响了桑的情绪,判断失误,出了事故。我们还是可以说桑情绪变化was not her fault。过错在领队。不过无法控制情绪,对职业运动员来说,仍然是学艺不精!

如果大家开动思路,这样的例子还可以举出很多。

2 保险公司说it is not Sang Lan‘s fault也不必然证明任何第三方有fault过错。

比如上面的第二种可能性中,我们就无法让纽约的气候或现场观众承担什么责任,更谈不上运动会的组织者要负责了。

即使被桑兰骂得体无完肤的罗马尼亚教练,陪审团仍然可能判断他当时重整垫子的行为是合理的,不存在疏忽,或与桑的受伤没有因果关系(因为桑的教练中途高声提示桑,已经让桑有机会中止该次热身训练)

桑兰和黄健不懂逻辑,海明“律师”也不懂。拿着那样一个和解协议,可笑地向全世界宣布美国体操协会给桑平了反,是典型的自说自话。

3 桑兰是否学艺不精,以及第三者是否存在过错fault,与保险公司是否理赔几乎没有关系

我没有看过友好运动会的保单,但猜测多半是CGL一类的coverage。即除了几类约定的排除exclusion外,保险公司会对比赛中出现的所有意外、事故或人为疏失都承担赔付责任。所谓“排除exclusion,”不外乎指不赔付因组委会的犯罪行为或恶意行动引发的索赔而已。换言之,桑兰是否有过错,罗马尼亚教练或美国体操协会是否有过错,对保险公司而言没有区别,反正他们都会理赔。

不要怀疑存在这样的宽泛保险。当年O.J Simpson刑事案件的辩护帐单大部由他的保险公司负担,比这里的保单的coverage更大。

4 桑兰13年前应该没有权力单独起诉美国体操协会和其他组办方存在过失或过错

这一点很多网友都指出了,所有参赛国家的代表团应该都代表团员与组办方签订过免责waiver协议。我倾向于相信这一点,因为这是国际比赛的惯例。

抛开诉讼时效不谈,13年后桑仍然没有权利起诉组办方或美国体操协会,不管海明“律师”用什么其他的幌子包装,道理是一样的。

起诉监护人和莫虎过去没有怂恿和协助桑兰恶意起诉和敲诈,那就是赤裸裸的讹诈了。

5 美国体操协会是否参加了和解谈判

买过责任保单的人都知道,一旦发生了claim或与claim相关的诉讼,Insurance carrier多半会指定legal counsel与投保人联系,接管诉讼事宜,说白了就是代理投保人打官司,并根据保险公司的判断决定是否和解。投保人也落得个清静。在这种情况下,同一律师或律师所多半同时代理保险公司和投保人。

对保险公司和美国体操协会的撤诉文件显示确系同一NY律师同时代理几家保险公司和美国体操协会。(即使桑兰13年前事故发生后立即起诉美国体操协会和其他组办方,保险公司的反应也不会有什么区别,一样是指派律师代理美国体操协会,法庭见。)

这样从理论上说,美国体操协会通过律师参加了和桑兰的谈判,协会的律师也代表前者签了字。桑兰和海明这部分没撒谎。

但事实上,美国体操协会根本就没派人从盐湖城到纽约,他们头两天也不清楚海明大肆吹嘘的和解协议里说了什么,更遑论为桑兰“平反”了。他们知道的就是协会没接到传票,对方也撤诉了。当中文媒体询问他们关于“平反”的事情时,对方肯定是一头雾水。这和下面所说的重启调查一样,是桑兰一方的谎言。

6 美国体操协会和保险公司不可能重启事故调查

海明和桑兰在记者招待会上,第一声称美国体操协会为桑兰“平反”,第二还声称对方是经过调查才作出的平反决定。这纯粹是欺负国内的人不懂国外的调查程序而撒的又一个弥天大谎。美国是个注重程序正义的国家,13年后,没有任何证据、证人,时间久远,无法还原当时的场景,美国体操协会和保险公司如何重启事故调查,并作出“平反”结论?这几个人谎撒得何其多也。

7 建议大家到Pacer下载莫虎律师的Rule 11看看,这是海明近日在博客上色厉内荏惊恐不安的真正原因。

海明的某位无知拥趸曾说法官不会看莫虎的厚砖头文件。告诉这位拥趸,法官会读莫虎的动议,法官的clerks会仔细读,会检查里面每个case和citation,还会向法官汇报他们的看法。有人吸大麻之后的疯话翻译成英文后,法官看了会怎么想?他老人家会有幽默感吗?

海明“律师”写的那些令人汗颜的,充满了语法和拼写错误的“法律”文件,法官和他的clerks也会读。只不过外面的人会不时听到法官的chamber里传出的爆笑声。法官说不准会给New York State Bar写封信,谴责他们允许CUNY法学院的毕业生参加律师考试,他拿出的证据说不定就是这些一改再改仍然不知所云的一两重的东东啊!

PS 赞一下新华社的李大妈。在桑团队自说自话偷换概念前言不搭后语的强大谎言攻势前,她是唯一能保持独立判断能力的媒体人!
回复 xml11 2011-7-16 03:12
写得好!艾艾辛苦了!谢谢!
回复 夏天的驴 2011-7-16 02:33
艾艾做的好好!

新华社联系方式( 希望大家再一起写一封信,发给他们,我已经写了一封很简短抗议信。但是我的文笔实在太糟。比不了艾艾,我知道这里人才人。希望大家再起草一次给新华社的信。内容还希望大家讨论:

新华网地址:北京宣武门西大街127号 大成大厦
邮政编码:100031



新华网产业园区地址:北京大兴·国家新媒体产业基地 星光影视园10号
邮政编码:100162

新闻中心 (010)63070925 (24小时)
总 编 室 (010)63070950
纠错热线 (010)63070950

时政新闻部 (010)88050806
海外新闻部 (010)88050887
财经编辑部 (010)88050867
外文编辑部 (010)88050812
移动新媒体部 (010)88050807
多媒体部 (010)88050814

对外合作部 (010)88050827、88050893
技术保障部 (010)88050831
行政事务部 (010)88050834

市场部:(010)88050837、88050835
传真 (010)63070900、88050800

新华社地址 北京宣武门西大街57号
邮政编码 100803
电话总机 (010) 63071114
新华社总编辑室 xhszbs@xinhuanet.com
新华社国内部  xhsgnb@xinhuanet.com
新华社对外部  dwb@xinhuanet.com

新华社新闻热线:
国内报道 (010)63071111
摄影报道 (010)63073333
回复 zoebb88 2011-7-16 02:07
謝謝你。
回复 windbell 2011-7-16 01:42
艾艾辛苦了!
我们是P民,我们没有话语权也拿不到话筒(not like somebody)
但P民也有P民的思想!
12下一页

facelist

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

 留言请遵守道德与有关法律,请勿发表与本文章无关的内容(包括告状信、上访信、广告等)。
 所有留言均为网友自行发布,仅代表网友个人意见,不代表本网观点。

关于我们| 反馈意见 | 联系我们| 招聘信息| 返回手机版| 美国中文网

©2024  美国中文网 Sinovision,Inc.  All Rights Reserved. TOP

回顶部